2009•Zhiye yu jiankangRequires access

Comparison on Efficacy and Safety of Two Methods in the Treatment of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion Combined with HIV Infection

Weixin Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective]To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two different methods in the treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion combined with HIV infection.[Methods]26 cases in the treatment group were treated by closed thoracic drainage with central venous catheter, 28 cases in the control group received traditional thoracentesis, 2~3 times a week. The absorption time of pleural effusion, complication, times of thoracentesis, occupational exposure of medical staff and hospitalization days were observe.[Results]In the treatment group, the absorption time of pleural effusion was (10.35±3.02) d, there were 26 times of thoracentesis, 2 cases of complication, 1 case of occupational exposure, and hospitalization days was (19.88±3.51) d. In the control group, the absorption time of pleural effusion was (23.89±4.01) d, there were 86times of thoracentesis, 9 cases of complication, 1 case of occupational exposure, and hospitalization days was (31.55±7.96) d.[Conclusion]The clinical efficacy and safety of closed thoracic drainage with central venous catheter is better than those of traditional thoracentesis in the treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion combined with HIV infection

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective]To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two different methods in the treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion combined with HIV infection.[Methods]26 cases in the treatment group were treated by closed thoracic drainage with central venous catheter, 28 cases in the control group received traditional thoracentesis, 2~3 times a week. The absorption time of pleural effusion, complication, times of thoracentesis, occupational exposure of medical staff and hospitalization days were observe.[Results]In the treatment group, the absorption time of pleural effusion was (10.35±3.02) d, there were 26 times of thoracentesis, 2 cases of complication, 1 case of occupational exposure, and hospitalization days was (19.88±3.51) d. In the control group, the absorption time of pleural effusion was (23.89±4.01) d, there were 86times of thoracentesis, 9 cases of complication, 1 case of occupational exposure, and hospitalization days was (31.55±7.96) d.[Conclusion]The clinical efficacy and safety of closed thoracic drainage with central venous catheter is better than those of traditional thoracentesis in the treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion combined with HIV infection

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective]To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two different methods in the treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion combined with HIV infection.[Methods]26 cases in the treatment group were treated by closed thoracic drainage with central venous catheter, 28 cases in the control group received traditional thoracentesis, 2~3 times a week. The absorption time of pleural effusion, complication, times of thoracentesis, occupational exposure of medical staff and hospitalization days were observe.[Results]In the treatment group, the absorption time of pleural effusion was (10.35±3.02) d, there were 26 times of thoracentesis, 2 cases of complication, 1 case of occupational exposure, and hospitalization days was (19.88±3.51) d. In the control group, the absorption time of pleural effusion was (23.89±4.01) d, there were 86times of thoracentesis, 9 cases of complication, 1 case of occupational exposure, and hospitalization days was (31.55±7.96) d.[Conclusion]The clinical efficacy and safety of closed thoracic drainage with central venous catheter is better than those of traditional thoracentesis in the treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion combined with HIV infection

Key concepts: Thoracentesis, Medicine, Pleural effusion, Complication, Surgery, Effusion, Central venous catheter, Catheter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison on Efficacy and Safety of Two Methods in the Treatment of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion Combined with HIV Infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens