2001•Henan yixue yanjiuRequires access

Study on the expression of PR,PR-B and PCNA in endometrial hyperplasia

Hong Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study the expression and the biological character of PR,PR B in endometrial hyperplasia and the pathogenetic mechanism of endometrial hyperplasia for providing theoretical basis of medical treatment and prognostic value. Methods: The expressions of PR, PR B?PCNA were examined by SP immunohistochemical method in 51 cases with endometrial hyperplasia (20 cases with simple endometrial hyperplasia, 16 cases with complex endometrial hyperplasia and 15 cases with atypical endometrial hyperplasia). At the same time 20 cases with normal proliferative phase were chosen as control group. Results: The expression of PR has no significance in endometrial hyperplasia ( P 0 05). Positive PR B expression abated from simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia to atypical endometrial hyperplasia. There were the lowest expression especially in atypical endometrial hyperplasia ( P 0.01). The expression of PCNA of atypical and complex hyperplasia were significantly higher than that of simple hyperplasia and normal proliferative phase ( P 0.05). The frequency of PR B protein expression in the group with PCNA positive staining was significant lower than that in the negative group ( P 0.05). Conclusion: The changes of PR was of no significance in pathogenesis of endometrial hyperplasia. The changes of PR B was related with the genesis, progression and tumor changing of endometrial hyperplasia. PR B and PCNA may be useful markers to predict curative effect and prognosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study the expression and the biological character of PR,PR B in endometrial hyperplasia and the pathogenetic mechanism of endometrial hyperplasia for providing theoretical basis of medical treatment and prognostic value. Methods: The expressions of PR, PR B?PCNA were examined by SP immunohistochemical method in 51 cases with endometrial hyperplasia (20 cases with simple endometrial hyperplasia, 16 cases with complex endometrial hyperplasia and 15 cases with atypical endometrial hyperplasia). At the same time 20 cases with normal proliferative phase were chosen as control group. Results: The expression of PR has no significance in endometrial hyperplasia ( P 0 05). Positive PR B expression abated from simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia to atypical endometrial hyperplasia. There were the lowest expression especially in atypical endometrial hyperplasia ( P 0.01). The expression of PCNA of atypical and complex hyperplasia were significantly higher than that of simple hyperplasia and normal proliferative phase ( P 0.05). The frequency of PR B protein expression in the group with PCNA positive staining was significant lower than that in the negative group ( P 0.05). Conclusion: The changes of PR was of no significance in pathogenesis of endometrial hyperplasia. The changes of PR B was related with the genesis, progression and tumor changing of endometrial hyperplasia. PR B and PCNA may be useful markers to predict curative effect and prognosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study the expression and the biological character of PR,PR B in endometrial hyperplasia and the pathogenetic mechanism of endometrial hyperplasia for providing theoretical basis of medical treatment and prognostic value. Methods: The expressions of PR, PR B?PCNA were examined by SP immunohistochemical method in 51 cases with endometrial hyperplasia (20 cases with simple endometrial hyperplasia, 16 cases with complex endometrial hyperplasia and 15 cases with atypical endometrial hyperplasia). At the same time 20 cases with normal proliferative phase were chosen as control group. Results: The expression of PR has no significance in endometrial hyperplasia ( P 0 05). Positive PR B expression abated from simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia to atypical endometrial hyperplasia. There were the lowest expression especially in atypical endometrial hyperplasia ( P 0.01). The expression of PCNA of atypical and complex hyperplasia were significantly higher than that of simple hyperplasia and normal proliferative phase ( P 0.05). The frequency of PR B protein expression in the group with PCNA positive staining was significant lower than that in the negative group ( P 0.05). Conclusion: The changes of PR was of no significance in pathogenesis of endometrial hyperplasia. The changes of PR B was related with the genesis, progression and tumor changing of endometrial hyperplasia. PR B and PCNA may be useful markers to predict curative effect and prognosis.

Key concepts: Hyperplasia, Endometrial hyperplasia, Atypical hyperplasia, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Immunohistochemistry, Medicine, Pathogenesis, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on the expression of PR,PR-B and PCNA in endometrial hyperplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens