2002Journal of Northeast Normal UniversityRequires access

The Retrospective of Qing Dynasty's Academic Historical Study in the 20th Century

WU Shao-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the first half of the 20th century, the bourgeois historians, like Liang Qichao and Qian Mu, when studying the academic history of Qing dynasty, tried their best to avoid sectarian bias, and attached importance to revealing various academic thoughts and internal relations of every school's rise and decline. In the later half, Marxist historians like Hou Wailu , with the theory and method of historical materialism, cleared and explored abundant ideological culture legacy of Qing dynasty's academic research. In the past twenty years, historical experts made objective appraise on Qing dynasty's learning, and open up many new domains. We should also behold that there are still some deficiencies in such study of this period. When facing this, we should inherit critically and do our best to make more brilliant success in the 21st century.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the first half of the 20th century, the bourgeois historians, like Liang Qichao and Qian Mu, when studying the academic history of Qing dynasty, tried their best to avoid sectarian bias, and attached importance to revealing various academic thoughts and internal relations of every school's rise and decline. In the later half, Marxist historians like Hou Wailu , with the theory and method of historical materialism, cleared and explored abundant ideological culture legacy of Qing dynasty's academic research. In the past twenty years, historical experts made objective appraise on Qing dynasty's learning, and open up many new domains. We should also behold that there are still some deficiencies in such study of this period. When facing this, we should inherit critically and do our best to make more brilliant success in the 21st century.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the first half of the 20th century, the bourgeois historians, like Liang Qichao and Qian Mu, when studying the academic history of Qing dynasty, tried their best to avoid sectarian bias, and attached importance to revealing various academic thoughts and internal relations of every school's rise and decline. In the later half, Marxist historians like Hou Wailu , with the theory and method of historical materialism, cleared and explored abundant ideological culture legacy of Qing dynasty's academic research. In the past twenty years, historical experts made objective appraise on Qing dynasty's learning, and open up many new domains. We should also behold that there are still some deficiencies in such study of this period. When facing this, we should inherit critically and do our best to make more brilliant success in the 21st century.

Key concepts: Ideology, Marxist philosophy, Period (music), Clearance, Historical materialism, Bourgeoisie, History, Behold

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Retrospective of Qing Dynasty's Academic Historical Study in the 20th Century — Research Paper | ScholarLens