2011•Journal of clinical and experimental medicineRequires access

Evaluation of two assays for the determination of serum AFP

Hui Zhao-hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of the time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay(TRFIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) methods in the determination of serum AFP levels for the patients of primary hepatic carcinoma(PHC).Methods Sixty-six patients with PHC and 60 healthy controls were included in this study.The serum levels of AFP were determined by TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.The correlation,linearity,precision,sensitivity and specificity of two assays were evaluated.Results The serum levels of AFP for TRFIA and ELISA in 66 patients with PHC were(185.36±118.22)ng/L and(216.25±193.20)ng/ml,respectively.The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were 98.33% and 78.78% for TRFIA,and 96.66% and 68.18% for ELISA,respectively.However,in 60 healthy controls,these were(5.31±3.57)ng/L and(14.75±6.80)ng/ml,respectively.The diagnostic specificities were 98.33% and 96.66% for TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.TRFIA had higher sensitivity than ELISA(P0.05),but the specificities of both assays were similar(P0.05).There was excellent correlation between TRFIA and ELISA.The linear ranges of AFP were 0.73~1 066.00 ng/L,and 4.22~534.00 ng/L for TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.TRFIA was superior to ELISA for the determination range,within-batch and between-batch precision.Conclusion The results indicate that both TRFIA and ELISA meet the clinical diagnostic needs,but the sensitivity,linearity and precision of TRFIA are superior to ELISA for identifying the patients with PHC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of the time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay(TRFIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) methods in the determination of serum AFP levels for the patients of primary hepatic carcinoma(PHC).Methods Sixty-six patients with PHC and 60 healthy controls were included in this study.The serum levels of AFP were determined by TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.The correlation,linearity,precision,sensitivity and specificity of two assays were evaluated.Results The serum levels of AFP for TRFIA and ELISA in 66 patients with PHC were(185.36±118.22)ng/L and(216.25±193.20)ng/ml,respectively.The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were 98.33% and 78.78% for TRFIA,and 96.66% and 68.18% for ELISA,respectively.However,in 60 healthy controls,these were(5.31±3.57)ng/L and(14.75±6.80)ng/ml,respectively.The diagnostic specificities were 98.33% and 96.66% for TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.TRFIA had higher sensitivity than ELISA(P0.05),but the specificities of both assays were similar(P0.05).There was excellent correlation between TRFIA and ELISA.The linear ranges of AFP were 0.73~1 066.00 ng/L,and 4.22~534.00 ng/L for TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.TRFIA was superior to ELISA for the determination range,within-batch and between-batch precision.Conclusion The results indicate that both TRFIA and ELISA meet the clinical diagnostic needs,but the sensitivity,linearity and precision of TRFIA are superior to ELISA for identifying the patients with PHC.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of the time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay(TRFIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) methods in the determination of serum AFP levels for the patients of primary hepatic carcinoma(PHC).Methods Sixty-six patients with PHC and 60 healthy controls were included in this study.The serum levels of AFP were determined by TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.The correlation,linearity,precision,sensitivity and specificity of two assays were evaluated.Results The serum levels of AFP for TRFIA and ELISA in 66 patients with PHC were(185.36±118.22)ng/L and(216.25±193.20)ng/ml,respectively.The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were 98.33% and 78.78% for TRFIA,and 96.66% and 68.18% for ELISA,respectively.However,in 60 healthy controls,these were(5.31±3.57)ng/L and(14.75±6.80)ng/ml,respectively.The diagnostic specificities were 98.33% and 96.66% for TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.TRFIA had higher sensitivity than ELISA(P0.05),but the specificities of both assays were similar(P0.05).There was excellent correlation between TRFIA and ELISA.The linear ranges of AFP were 0.73~1 066.00 ng/L,and 4.22~534.00 ng/L for TRFIA and ELISA,respectively.TRFIA was superior to ELISA for the determination range,within-batch and between-batch precision.Conclusion The results indicate that both TRFIA and ELISA meet the clinical diagnostic needs,but the sensitivity,linearity and precision of TRFIA are superior to ELISA for identifying the patients with PHC.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of two assays for the determination of serum AFP — Research Paper | ScholarLens