Patient-Controlled Sedation versus Nurse-Administered Sedation with Propofol during Colonoscopy
Jeehyun Oh, Hoon Cho, Yeung-Muk Kim, Mu-Yeul Lee, Guang-Soon An, Hyun-Jeung Kim, Hyun-Gwang Jung, Kang Min Kim, Joon‐Sang Lee
Abstract
Jeehyun Oh, Hoon Cho, Yeung-Muk Kim, Mu-Yeul Lee, Guang-Soon An, Hyun-Jeung Kim, Hyun-Gwang Jung, Kang Min Kim, Joon‐Sang Lee
Abstract
Background/Aims: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows the patients to titrate the dosages of sedative drug according to their needs. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and the efficacy of nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) with those of PCS. Methods: Eighty one patients were randomly assigned to two groups. All patients received meperidine 25 mg and propofol 40 mg as an initial dose for sedation. Patients in PCS group were subsequently infused with propofol 15mg over 80 seconds through infusion pump whenever they required. Patients in NAPS group were injected with 10-20 mg propofol by nurse with supervision by endoscopist. The dosage of propofol, cardiopulmonary parameters, procedure time, sedation score, pain score, the patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction scores were assessed. Results: With regard to blood pressure, pulse rate and oxygen saturation, serious complications were not observed. Especially, there was no significant difference of mean total dose between two groups (NAPS group and PCS group received 76.724.7 mg and 82.526.6 mg respectively).Pain score was higher in woman than in man (p=0.03).Conclusions: 1.2-1.5 mg/kg of propofol with small dose of opioid during colonoscopy was effective and safe. NAPS was more practical and useful method of sedation than PCS during colonoscopy.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background/Aims: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows the patients to titrate the dosages of sedative drug according to their needs. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and the efficacy of nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) with those of PCS. Methods: Eighty one patients were randomly assigned to two groups. All patients received meperidine 25 mg and propofol 40 mg as an initial dose for sedation. Patients in PCS group were subsequently infused with propofol 15mg over 80 seconds through infusion pump whenever they required. Patients in NAPS group were injected with 10-20 mg propofol by nurse with supervision by endoscopist. The dosage of propofol, cardiopulmonary parameters, procedure time, sedation score, pain score, the patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction scores were assessed. Results: With regard to blood pressure, pulse rate and oxygen saturation, serious complications were not observed. Especially, there was no significant difference of mean total dose between two groups (NAPS group and PCS group received 76.724.7 mg and 82.526.6 mg respectively).Pain score was higher in woman than in man (p=0.03).Conclusions: 1.2-1.5 mg/kg of propofol with small dose of opioid during colonoscopy was effective and safe. NAPS was more practical and useful method of sedation than PCS during colonoscopy.
Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Sedation, Colonoscopy, Anesthesia, Dose, Sedative, Oxygen saturation