The effect of propofol for conscious sedation during colonoscopy-A Prospective, Randomized Study
Hoon Cho, Yeong-Muk Kim, Ji-Hyeon Oh, Su-Jin Jeon, Jae-Hyeon Moon, Min-Hee Kim, Keum-Mi Park, Joon‐Sang Lee
Abstract
Hoon Cho, Yeong-Muk Kim, Ji-Hyeon Oh, Su-Jin Jeon, Jae-Hyeon Moon, Min-Hee Kim, Keum-Mi Park, Joon‐Sang Lee
Abstract
Background:The objectives of this study were to assess propofol as sedative agents for colonoscopy in the safety and efficacy, compared with midazolam plus meperidine. Methods:120 patients undergoing colonoscopy in a prospective study were randomly assigned to one of three medication regimens. Patients in group A (n=42) received i.v. 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam. Patients in group B (n=41) received i.v. a median dose of 96.59 mg of propofol (range 40-180) and patients in group C (n=37) received i.v. 25 mg of meperidine and a median dose of 77.03 mg of propofol (range 40-150), administered by a nurse with endoscopist supervision. Endpoints were patient satisfaction, procedure and recovery times and complications. Results:The mean time to sedation was much faster in 2 groups using propofol (group A: 152105.9 sec, group B: 52.946.5 sec, group C: 5663.7sec; p
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background:The objectives of this study were to assess propofol as sedative agents for colonoscopy in the safety and efficacy, compared with midazolam plus meperidine. Methods:120 patients undergoing colonoscopy in a prospective study were randomly assigned to one of three medication regimens. Patients in group A (n=42) received i.v. 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam. Patients in group B (n=41) received i.v. a median dose of 96.59 mg of propofol (range 40-180) and patients in group C (n=37) received i.v. 25 mg of meperidine and a median dose of 77.03 mg of propofol (range 40-150), administered by a nurse with endoscopist supervision. Endpoints were patient satisfaction, procedure and recovery times and complications. Results:The mean time to sedation was much faster in 2 groups using propofol (group A: 152105.9 sec, group B: 52.946.5 sec, group C: 5663.7sec; p
Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Midazolam, Colonoscopy, Sedation, Anesthesia, Sedative, Prospective cohort study