2011Shiyong yixue zazhiRequires access

The clinical analysis of two analgesic methods in preoperative induced abortion

Zhang Yan-cha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the degrees of cervical relaxation,pain and other clinical effects in induced abortion before surgery,oral misoprostol and paracervical injection with lidocaine were used. Methods 260 women with early pregnance were randomly divided into two groups. A group:the oral misoprostol group,0.4 mg Dayton misoprostol was taken orally 2 hours before the operation. B group:the lidocaine-injected group,the cervical tissue were injected respectively with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride for 2.5 mL at 4,8 o′clock about 5 minutes before the surgery. The cervical relaxation,pain and other indexs were observed. Results There was statistically significant difference between A group and B group in the degree of cervical relaxation during operation(P 0.05) ,especially in taking effect of the drugs(P 0.01) . There was no significant difference between A group and B group in the analgesic effect(P 0.05) . Conclusions A group and B group methods play an important part in the cervical relaxation and analgesia results with satisfaction. They are safe,simple,effective. The former is more received by the performer and patients,and worthy of application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the degrees of cervical relaxation,pain and other clinical effects in induced abortion before surgery,oral misoprostol and paracervical injection with lidocaine were used. Methods 260 women with early pregnance were randomly divided into two groups. A group:the oral misoprostol group,0.4 mg Dayton misoprostol was taken orally 2 hours before the operation. B group:the lidocaine-injected group,the cervical tissue were injected respectively with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride for 2.5 mL at 4,8 o′clock about 5 minutes before the surgery. The cervical relaxation,pain and other indexs were observed. Results There was statistically significant difference between A group and B group in the degree of cervical relaxation during operation(P 0.05) ,especially in taking effect of the drugs(P 0.01) . There was no significant difference between A group and B group in the analgesic effect(P 0.05) . Conclusions A group and B group methods play an important part in the cervical relaxation and analgesia results with satisfaction. They are safe,simple,effective. The former is more received by the performer and patients,and worthy of application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the degrees of cervical relaxation,pain and other clinical effects in induced abortion before surgery,oral misoprostol and paracervical injection with lidocaine were used. Methods 260 women with early pregnance were randomly divided into two groups. A group:the oral misoprostol group,0.4 mg Dayton misoprostol was taken orally 2 hours before the operation. B group:the lidocaine-injected group,the cervical tissue were injected respectively with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride for 2.5 mL at 4,8 o′clock about 5 minutes before the surgery. The cervical relaxation,pain and other indexs were observed. Results There was statistically significant difference between A group and B group in the degree of cervical relaxation during operation(P 0.05) ,especially in taking effect of the drugs(P 0.01) . There was no significant difference between A group and B group in the analgesic effect(P 0.05) . Conclusions A group and B group methods play an important part in the cervical relaxation and analgesia results with satisfaction. They are safe,simple,effective. The former is more received by the performer and patients,and worthy of application.

Key concepts: Misoprostol, Medicine, Lidocaine, Anesthesia, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Analgesic, Abortion, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical analysis of two analgesic methods in preoperative induced abortion — Research Paper | ScholarLens