2001PubMedRequires access

[Clinical assessment of the effect of intravenous patient controlled intravenous analgesia and epidural patient controlled epidural analgesia in postoperative analgesia].

L Qiao, Lu Q, S Zhang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect and side-effect of intravenous patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). METHODS: Two hundred and forty postoperative patients, who were randomly divided into three groups: group PCIA, group PCEA and control, 80 cases for each group, and the recovery of bowel movement, urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, postpartum hemorrhage, lactation and recovery of uterus were observed after operation. RESULTS: Overall patients in two PCA groups were satisfied with the postoperative analgesia. The incidence of urinary retention in group PCIA were significantly lower than that in group PCEA(P < 0.05). The recovery of bowel movement in group PCEA (17.51 +/- 10.33) was much bigger than that in group PCIA (28.70 +/- 16.36) (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences between two PCA groups in nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression and pruritus (P > 0.05). There were no remarkable differences between two PCA groups and control in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, lactation and recovery of uterus. CONCLUSIONS: Both PCIA and PCEA have excellent analgesic effect. PCIA has lower incidence of urinary retention, and has higher sedative incidence compared with PCEA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect and side-effect of intravenous patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). METHODS: Two hundred and forty postoperative patients, who were randomly divided into three groups: group PCIA, group PCEA and control, 80 cases for each group, and the recovery of bowel movement, urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, postpartum hemorrhage, lactation and recovery of uterus were observed after operation. RESULTS: Overall patients in two PCA groups were satisfied with the postoperative analgesia. The incidence of urinary retention in group PCIA were significantly lower than that in group PCEA(P < 0.05). The recovery of bowel movement in group PCEA (17.51 +/- 10.33) was much bigger than that in group PCIA (28.70 +/- 16.36) (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences between two PCA groups in nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression and pruritus (P > 0.05). There were no remarkable differences between two PCA groups and control in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, lactation and recovery of uterus. CONCLUSIONS: Both PCIA and PCEA have excellent analgesic effect. PCIA has lower incidence of urinary retention, and has higher sedative incidence compared with PCEA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect and side-effect of intravenous patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). METHODS: Two hundred and forty postoperative patients, who were randomly divided into three groups: group PCIA, group PCEA and control, 80 cases for each group, and the recovery of bowel movement, urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, postpartum hemorrhage, lactation and recovery of uterus were observed after operation. RESULTS: Overall patients in two PCA groups were satisfied with the postoperative analgesia. The incidence of urinary retention in group PCIA were significantly lower than that in group PCEA(P < 0.05). The recovery of bowel movement in group PCEA (17.51 +/- 10.33) was much bigger than that in group PCIA (28.70 +/- 16.36) (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences between two PCA groups in nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression and pruritus (P > 0.05). There were no remarkable differences between two PCA groups and control in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, lactation and recovery of uterus. CONCLUSIONS: Both PCIA and PCEA have excellent analgesic effect. PCIA has lower incidence of urinary retention, and has higher sedative incidence compared with PCEA.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Vomiting, Urinary retention, Nausea, Analgesic, Urinary system, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Clinical assessment of the effect of intravenous patient controlled intravenous analgesia and epidural patient controlled epidural analgesia in postoperative analgesia]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens