Clinical Observations on Triple Needling plus Mountain-burning Fire Needling Method for the Treatment of Neck-shoulder Syndrome
Zou We
Abstract
Zou We
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of triple needling plus mountain-burning fire needling method in treating neck-shoulder syndrome. Methods Sixty patients with neck-shoulder syndrome were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 30 cases and a control group of 30 cases. The treatment group received triple needling plus mountain-burning fire needling method and the control group, conventional acupuncture. The clinical therapeutic effects were evaluated in the two groups after 21 days of treatment. Results The total efficacy rate was 93.3% in the treatment group and 80.0% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05). The cure and marked efficacy rate was 80.0% in the treatment group and 53.3% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05). Conclusion Triple needling plus mountain-burning fire needling method has clinically a good therapeutic effect on neck-shoulder syndrome.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of triple needling plus mountain-burning fire needling method in treating neck-shoulder syndrome. Methods Sixty patients with neck-shoulder syndrome were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 30 cases and a control group of 30 cases. The treatment group received triple needling plus mountain-burning fire needling method and the control group, conventional acupuncture. The clinical therapeutic effects were evaluated in the two groups after 21 days of treatment. Results The total efficacy rate was 93.3% in the treatment group and 80.0% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05). The cure and marked efficacy rate was 80.0% in the treatment group and 53.3% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05). Conclusion Triple needling plus mountain-burning fire needling method has clinically a good therapeutic effect on neck-shoulder syndrome.
Key concepts: Dry needling, Medicine, Acupuncture, Therapeutic effect, Clinical efficacy, Surgery, Significant difference, Anesthesia