2012China Practical MedicineRequires access

Controlled study on lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair and traditional hernia repair for inguinal hernia

Liu Xin-sha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compared the clinical effects and advantages of lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair and traditional hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia in adults.Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed of 67 cases receiving Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair(tension-free group) and 46 cases receiving traditional hernia repair(traditional group).Results Compared with traditional group,the tension-free group had shorter operation time,postoperative pain duration,postoperative time to start out-of-bed and postoperative hospitalization time(P0.01).The traditional group had higher incidence of complications and recurrence rate than the tension-free group(P0.01).Conclusion Compared with hernia repair,tension-free hernia repair has the advantages of local tension-free,easier surgical operation,quicker postoperative recovery,fewer complications and lower recurrence rate,therefore it is one of ideal hernia repair for inguinal hernia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compared the clinical effects and advantages of lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair and traditional hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia in adults.Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed of 67 cases receiving Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair(tension-free group) and 46 cases receiving traditional hernia repair(traditional group).Results Compared with traditional group,the tension-free group had shorter operation time,postoperative pain duration,postoperative time to start out-of-bed and postoperative hospitalization time(P0.01).The traditional group had higher incidence of complications and recurrence rate than the tension-free group(P0.01).Conclusion Compared with hernia repair,tension-free hernia repair has the advantages of local tension-free,easier surgical operation,quicker postoperative recovery,fewer complications and lower recurrence rate,therefore it is one of ideal hernia repair for inguinal hernia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compared the clinical effects and advantages of lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair and traditional hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia in adults.Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed of 67 cases receiving Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair(tension-free group) and 46 cases receiving traditional hernia repair(traditional group).Results Compared with traditional group,the tension-free group had shorter operation time,postoperative pain duration,postoperative time to start out-of-bed and postoperative hospitalization time(P0.01).The traditional group had higher incidence of complications and recurrence rate than the tension-free group(P0.01).Conclusion Compared with hernia repair,tension-free hernia repair has the advantages of local tension-free,easier surgical operation,quicker postoperative recovery,fewer complications and lower recurrence rate,therefore it is one of ideal hernia repair for inguinal hernia.

Key concepts: Medicine, Inguinal hernia, Hernia repair, Surgery, Hernia, Postoperative pain, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Controlled study on lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair and traditional hernia repair for inguinal hernia — Research Paper | ScholarLens