2011Medical Journal of West ChinaRequires access

Different dosage regimens of remifentanil,lidocain and propofol for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants

Run Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The study was designed to compare the intubating conditions and haemodynamic responses without muscle relaxants following different dosage regimens of remifentanil,lidocaine and propofol.Methods 80 healthy patients were assigned to four groups,including Group Ⅰ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,Group Ⅱ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg,lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,Group Ⅲ treated with remifentanil 4μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,and Group Ⅳ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg and propofol 3 mg/kg.Groups Ⅰ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ were given same volume of 0.9% saline instead of lidocaine in Group Ⅱ.The intubating conditions were assessed as excellent,good or poor.Mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate(HR) were recorded before induction,postinduction,immediately after intubation,and three and five minutes after intubation.Results Satisfactory intubation conditions in Group I were significantly better than that in Group Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ(P﹤0.05).Significant reductions in MAP and HR after administration were observed in each group(P﹤0.05).Conclusion The coadministration of remifentanil 3μg/kg,lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg,and propofol 2 mg/kg may reliably provide adequate conditions for tracheal intubation with less hemodynamic suppression in healthy patients without muscle relaxants.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The study was designed to compare the intubating conditions and haemodynamic responses without muscle relaxants following different dosage regimens of remifentanil,lidocaine and propofol.Methods 80 healthy patients were assigned to four groups,including Group Ⅰ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,Group Ⅱ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg,lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,Group Ⅲ treated with remifentanil 4μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,and Group Ⅳ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg and propofol 3 mg/kg.Groups Ⅰ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ were given same volume of 0.9% saline instead of lidocaine in Group Ⅱ.The intubating conditions were assessed as excellent,good or poor.Mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate(HR) were recorded before induction,postinduction,immediately after intubation,and three and five minutes after intubation.Results Satisfactory intubation conditions in Group I were significantly better than that in Group Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ(P﹤0.05).Significant reductions in MAP and HR after administration were observed in each group(P﹤0.05).Conclusion The coadministration of remifentanil 3μg/kg,lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg,and propofol 2 mg/kg may reliably provide adequate conditions for tracheal intubation with less hemodynamic suppression in healthy patients without muscle relaxants.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The study was designed to compare the intubating conditions and haemodynamic responses without muscle relaxants following different dosage regimens of remifentanil,lidocaine and propofol.Methods 80 healthy patients were assigned to four groups,including Group Ⅰ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,Group Ⅱ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg,lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,Group Ⅲ treated with remifentanil 4μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg,and Group Ⅳ treated with remifentanil 3μg/kg and propofol 3 mg/kg.Groups Ⅰ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ were given same volume of 0.9% saline instead of lidocaine in Group Ⅱ.The intubating conditions were assessed as excellent,good or poor.Mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate(HR) were recorded before induction,postinduction,immediately after intubation,and three and five minutes after intubation.Results Satisfactory intubation conditions in Group I were significantly better than that in Group Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ(P﹤0.05).Significant reductions in MAP and HR after administration were observed in each group(P﹤0.05).Conclusion The coadministration of remifentanil 3μg/kg,lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg,and propofol 2 mg/kg may reliably provide adequate conditions for tracheal intubation with less hemodynamic suppression in healthy patients without muscle relaxants.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Propofol, Medicine, Lidocaine, Anesthesia, Intubation, Tracheal intubation, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Different dosage regimens of remifentanil,lidocain and propofol for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants — Research Paper | ScholarLens