2003Henan yixue yanjiuRequires access

The comparison of the second morning urine and ten items of the first morning urine analysis

Gao Yuan-fa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the probability of using the second morning urine in place of ten items of the first morning urine analysis.Methods: To select the inpatients mid-stream urine liquid at 5∶00~6∶00 in the morning then sent it to the lab in time and made the ten items of urine test,after the urine liquid was laid for three hours , then made the ten items of urine test again;at 8∶00~9∶00, to take the mid-stream urine liquid again and made a test then compared the difference of them.Results: After the first morning urine was laid for 3 hours, among the ten items of urine's assay, the effect of GIU ?PRO and WBC heightened (P0.05~0.001), among the ten items of the second morning urine analysis the effect of GIU. WBC heightened distinctly (P0.05). The effect of the other test items were not difference in statistics (P0.05). Conclusion: Useing the second morning urine heighted the ratio of masculine of some test items, suggest to take the second morning urine and make the ten items of the first morning urine analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To discuss the probability of using the second morning urine in place of ten items of the first morning urine analysis.Methods: To select the inpatients mid-stream urine liquid at 5∶00~6∶00 in the morning then sent it to the lab in time and made the ten items of urine test,after the urine liquid was laid for three hours , then made the ten items of urine test again;at 8∶00~9∶00, to take the mid-stream urine liquid again and made a test then compared the difference of them.Results: After the first morning urine was laid for 3 hours, among the ten items of urine's assay, the effect of GIU ?PRO and WBC heightened (P0.05~0.001), among the ten items of the second morning urine analysis the effect of GIU. WBC heightened distinctly (P0.05). The effect of the other test items were not difference in statistics (P0.05). Conclusion: Useing the second morning urine heighted the ratio of masculine of some test items, suggest to take the second morning urine and make the ten items of the first morning urine analysis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To discuss the probability of using the second morning urine in place of ten items of the first morning urine analysis.Methods: To select the inpatients mid-stream urine liquid at 5∶00~6∶00 in the morning then sent it to the lab in time and made the ten items of urine test,after the urine liquid was laid for three hours , then made the ten items of urine test again;at 8∶00~9∶00, to take the mid-stream urine liquid again and made a test then compared the difference of them.Results: After the first morning urine was laid for 3 hours, among the ten items of urine's assay, the effect of GIU ?PRO and WBC heightened (P0.05~0.001), among the ten items of the second morning urine analysis the effect of GIU. WBC heightened distinctly (P0.05). The effect of the other test items were not difference in statistics (P0.05). Conclusion: Useing the second morning urine heighted the ratio of masculine of some test items, suggest to take the second morning urine and make the ten items of the first morning urine analysis.

Key concepts: Urine, Morning, Significant difference, Urine sample, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparison of the second morning urine and ten items of the first morning urine analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens