ScholarLens Back to search
2006•Guoji yiyao weisheng daobaoRequires access

The Observation on Clinical Effects of two Local Anesthetics

Bing Du

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare clinical effects of Articaine and Xylocaine Hydrochloride on orallocal anesthesia. Methods 3690 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Articaine grou andXylocaine Hydrochloride group Patients in each group were anesthetized by local anesthesia or blockanesthesia. Pains during injection and surgery, effects of anesthetic, and complications duringanesthetization were analyzed. Results Pains during injection and surgery in Articaine group wasmagnificently less than ones in Xylocaine Hy drochloride group. The lasting time of block anesthesiaand infiltration anesthesia in Artiaine group was much longer than that in Xylocaine Hydrochloridegroup.No magnificent toxic side effects were found in Articaine group. Conclusions Articaine was oneof local anesthetics with good infiltration, safety and anesehetic effect. It would be more and morewidely used in oral treatment field in the future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare clinical effects of Articaine and Xylocaine Hydrochloride on orallocal anesthesia. Methods 3690 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Articaine grou andXylocaine Hydrochloride group Patients in each group were anesthetized by local anesthesia or blockanesthesia. Pains during injection and surgery, effects of anesthetic, and complications duringanesthetization were analyzed. Results Pains during injection and surgery in Articaine group wasmagnificently less than ones in Xylocaine Hy drochloride group. The lasting time of block anesthesiaand infiltration anesthesia in Artiaine group was much longer than that in Xylocaine Hydrochloridegroup.No magnificent toxic side effects were found in Articaine group. Conclusions Articaine was oneof local anesthetics with good infiltration, safety and anesehetic effect. It would be more and morewidely used in oral treatment field in the future.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare clinical effects of Articaine and Xylocaine Hydrochloride on orallocal anesthesia. Methods 3690 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Articaine grou andXylocaine Hydrochloride group Patients in each group were anesthetized by local anesthesia or blockanesthesia. Pains during injection and surgery, effects of anesthetic, and complications duringanesthetization were analyzed. Results Pains during injection and surgery in Articaine group wasmagnificently less than ones in Xylocaine Hy drochloride group. The lasting time of block anesthesiaand infiltration anesthesia in Artiaine group was much longer than that in Xylocaine Hydrochloridegroup.No magnificent toxic side effects were found in Articaine group. Conclusions Articaine was oneof local anesthetics with good infiltration, safety and anesehetic effect. It would be more and morewidely used in oral treatment field in the future.

Key concepts: Articaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Local anesthetic, Anesthetic, Anesthetic Effect, Local anesthesia, Surgery

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Observation on Clinical Effects of two Local Anesthetics — Research Paper | ScholarLens