2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Different autologous bone sources in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis

Xiang Li-yua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of local bone graft and autologous iliac bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion( PLIF) in the treatment of degreeⅠdegenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods 50 patients with single segment degree Ⅰ spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups randomly. Group A were adminstered PLIF with local bone graft( n = 28) and group B with autologous iliac bone( n = 22). Operative time,blood loss,bone union rate and complications were compared between two groups. Results All patients were operated successfully.All patients were followed up for 10 ~ 16 months. Operative time and blood loss of group A was lower than group B significantly,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in wound healing time,slip rate,intervertebral height and intervertebral angle between two groups( P 0. 05). At the end of follow-up,there were 23 and 19 cases of osseous healing in group A and group B. Fusion rate were 82. 14%( 23 /28)and 86. 36%( 19 /22) respectively( P 0. 05). JOA scores were increased compared to the preoperative( P 0. 05),but no significant difference between two groups( P 0. 05). The incidence of complications was 3. 57%( 1 /28) and 63. 63%( 14 /22) in the group A group B respectively,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 01). Conclusions Both local bone graft and iliac bone graft on the single segment PLIF perform effectively. Iliac bone graft is easy to operate with less invasion and less adverse reactions,which is worthy to promote.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of local bone graft and autologous iliac bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion( PLIF) in the treatment of degreeⅠdegenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods 50 patients with single segment degree Ⅰ spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups randomly. Group A were adminstered PLIF with local bone graft( n = 28) and group B with autologous iliac bone( n = 22). Operative time,blood loss,bone union rate and complications were compared between two groups. Results All patients were operated successfully.All patients were followed up for 10 ~ 16 months. Operative time and blood loss of group A was lower than group B significantly,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in wound healing time,slip rate,intervertebral height and intervertebral angle between two groups( P 0. 05). At the end of follow-up,there were 23 and 19 cases of osseous healing in group A and group B. Fusion rate were 82. 14%( 23 /28)and 86. 36%( 19 /22) respectively( P 0. 05). JOA scores were increased compared to the preoperative( P 0. 05),but no significant difference between two groups( P 0. 05). The incidence of complications was 3. 57%( 1 /28) and 63. 63%( 14 /22) in the group A group B respectively,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 01). Conclusions Both local bone graft and iliac bone graft on the single segment PLIF perform effectively. Iliac bone graft is easy to operate with less invasion and less adverse reactions,which is worthy to promote.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of local bone graft and autologous iliac bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion( PLIF) in the treatment of degreeⅠdegenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods 50 patients with single segment degree Ⅰ spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups randomly. Group A were adminstered PLIF with local bone graft( n = 28) and group B with autologous iliac bone( n = 22). Operative time,blood loss,bone union rate and complications were compared between two groups. Results All patients were operated successfully.All patients were followed up for 10 ~ 16 months. Operative time and blood loss of group A was lower than group B significantly,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in wound healing time,slip rate,intervertebral height and intervertebral angle between two groups( P 0. 05). At the end of follow-up,there were 23 and 19 cases of osseous healing in group A and group B. Fusion rate were 82. 14%( 23 /28)and 86. 36%( 19 /22) respectively( P 0. 05). JOA scores were increased compared to the preoperative( P 0. 05),but no significant difference between two groups( P 0. 05). The incidence of complications was 3. 57%( 1 /28) and 63. 63%( 14 /22) in the group A group B respectively,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 01). Conclusions Both local bone graft and iliac bone graft on the single segment PLIF perform effectively. Iliac bone graft is easy to operate with less invasion and less adverse reactions,which is worthy to promote.

Key concepts: Medicine, Iliac bone, Surgery, Lumbar, Spondylolisthesis, Significant difference, Spinal fusion, Blood loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Different autologous bone sources in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis — Research Paper | ScholarLens