Different autologous bone sources in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
Xiang Li-yua
Abstract
Xiang Li-yua
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of local bone graft and autologous iliac bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion( PLIF) in the treatment of degreeⅠdegenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods 50 patients with single segment degree Ⅰ spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups randomly. Group A were adminstered PLIF with local bone graft( n = 28) and group B with autologous iliac bone( n = 22). Operative time,blood loss,bone union rate and complications were compared between two groups. Results All patients were operated successfully.All patients were followed up for 10 ~ 16 months. Operative time and blood loss of group A was lower than group B significantly,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in wound healing time,slip rate,intervertebral height and intervertebral angle between two groups( P 0. 05). At the end of follow-up,there were 23 and 19 cases of osseous healing in group A and group B. Fusion rate were 82. 14%( 23 /28)and 86. 36%( 19 /22) respectively( P 0. 05). JOA scores were increased compared to the preoperative( P 0. 05),but no significant difference between two groups( P 0. 05). The incidence of complications was 3. 57%( 1 /28) and 63. 63%( 14 /22) in the group A group B respectively,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 01). Conclusions Both local bone graft and iliac bone graft on the single segment PLIF perform effectively. Iliac bone graft is easy to operate with less invasion and less adverse reactions,which is worthy to promote.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of local bone graft and autologous iliac bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion( PLIF) in the treatment of degreeⅠdegenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods 50 patients with single segment degree Ⅰ spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups randomly. Group A were adminstered PLIF with local bone graft( n = 28) and group B with autologous iliac bone( n = 22). Operative time,blood loss,bone union rate and complications were compared between two groups. Results All patients were operated successfully.All patients were followed up for 10 ~ 16 months. Operative time and blood loss of group A was lower than group B significantly,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in wound healing time,slip rate,intervertebral height and intervertebral angle between two groups( P 0. 05). At the end of follow-up,there were 23 and 19 cases of osseous healing in group A and group B. Fusion rate were 82. 14%( 23 /28)and 86. 36%( 19 /22) respectively( P 0. 05). JOA scores were increased compared to the preoperative( P 0. 05),but no significant difference between two groups( P 0. 05). The incidence of complications was 3. 57%( 1 /28) and 63. 63%( 14 /22) in the group A group B respectively,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 01). Conclusions Both local bone graft and iliac bone graft on the single segment PLIF perform effectively. Iliac bone graft is easy to operate with less invasion and less adverse reactions,which is worthy to promote.
Key concepts: Medicine, Iliac bone, Surgery, Lumbar, Spondylolisthesis, Significant difference, Spinal fusion, Blood loss