Comparison of continuous epidural and intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain control in children
Ma Chang
Abstract
Ma Chang
Abstract
Objective:To compare the effect of combined general-epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia and fentanyl intravenously injected.Methods:91 pediatric patients undergoing lower extremities surgery randomly divided into epidural lidocaine group (n=61) and IV fentanyl group (n=30). During the operation, end-tidal enflurane concentration was controlled to maintain the blood pressure and heart rate within 10% of preoperative value. At the postoperative period, Parent Visual Analog Scale (PVAS), Objective Pain Score (OPS) and the incidence of nausea/vomiting were checked immediately, 6 hours and 24 hours after the patient's arriving at general ward.Results:Enflurane was significantly lower in epidural lidocaine group than that in IV fentanyl group (P0.05).Compare to IV fentanyl group, epidural lidocaine goup had significantly lower OPS at 6 hours after arrival. Epidural lidocaine group had significantly lower PVAS immediately 6 and 24 h after arrival. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between two groups.Conclusion:A combined general-epidural anesthesia could significantly decrease end-tidal enflurane concentration. Continuous patient-controlled epidural analgesia reduces postoperative pain scores significantly more than continuous patient-controlled IV fentanyl analgesia without any serious complications in pediatric lower extremity surgery.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To compare the effect of combined general-epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia and fentanyl intravenously injected.Methods:91 pediatric patients undergoing lower extremities surgery randomly divided into epidural lidocaine group (n=61) and IV fentanyl group (n=30). During the operation, end-tidal enflurane concentration was controlled to maintain the blood pressure and heart rate within 10% of preoperative value. At the postoperative period, Parent Visual Analog Scale (PVAS), Objective Pain Score (OPS) and the incidence of nausea/vomiting were checked immediately, 6 hours and 24 hours after the patient's arriving at general ward.Results:Enflurane was significantly lower in epidural lidocaine group than that in IV fentanyl group (P0.05).Compare to IV fentanyl group, epidural lidocaine goup had significantly lower OPS at 6 hours after arrival. Epidural lidocaine group had significantly lower PVAS immediately 6 and 24 h after arrival. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between two groups.Conclusion:A combined general-epidural anesthesia could significantly decrease end-tidal enflurane concentration. Continuous patient-controlled epidural analgesia reduces postoperative pain scores significantly more than continuous patient-controlled IV fentanyl analgesia without any serious complications in pediatric lower extremity surgery.
Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Enflurane, Nausea, Lidocaine, Vomiting, Visual analogue scale