2009•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of intravenous fentanyl analgesia and epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief].

Tsuyoshi Murakami, Yuko Okuda, Maki Ishii, Atsuko Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi Kawamura

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is available for postoperative pain relief except for the patients with bleeding tendency or under anticoagulation. Intravenous fentanyl analgesia can be applied for such patients but its effect has not been evaluated enough. We compared these two methods after abdominal surgery. METHODS: In the intravenous fentanyl analgesia group (group iv, n = 15), 0.7 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) fentanyl infusion was started during operation and decreased to 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) on the next morning. In the epidural analgesia group (group e, n = 15), 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) fentanyl and 5 ml x hr(-1) 1% mepivacaine infusion was started during operation. The VAS pain score (at rest and at coughing), the level of consciousness, respiratory and cardiovascular depression, nausea and vomiting were evaluated for 3 days. RESULTS: The VAS scores at rest were similar in two groups but the VAS scores at coughing were similar or lower in the group iv. In the group iv, five patients suffered from nausea and one patient had somnolence. In the group e, only one patient had nausea but two patients had hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous fentanyl analgesia is safe and possibly more effective than epidural analgesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is available for postoperative pain relief except for the patients with bleeding tendency or under anticoagulation. Intravenous fentanyl analgesia can be applied for such patients but its effect has not been evaluated enough. We compared these two methods after abdominal surgery. METHODS: In the intravenous fentanyl analgesia group (group iv, n = 15), 0.7 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) fentanyl infusion was started during operation and decreased to 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) on the next morning. In the epidural analgesia group (group e, n = 15), 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) fentanyl and 5 ml x hr(-1) 1% mepivacaine infusion was started during operation. The VAS pain score (at rest and at coughing), the level of consciousness, respiratory and cardiovascular depression, nausea and vomiting were evaluated for 3 days. RESULTS: The VAS scores at rest were similar in two groups but the VAS scores at coughing were similar or lower in the group iv. In the group iv, five patients suffered from nausea and one patient had somnolence. In the group e, only one patient had nausea but two patients had hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous fentanyl analgesia is safe and possibly more effective than epidural analgesia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is available for postoperative pain relief except for the patients with bleeding tendency or under anticoagulation. Intravenous fentanyl analgesia can be applied for such patients but its effect has not been evaluated enough. We compared these two methods after abdominal surgery. METHODS: In the intravenous fentanyl analgesia group (group iv, n = 15), 0.7 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) fentanyl infusion was started during operation and decreased to 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) on the next morning. In the epidural analgesia group (group e, n = 15), 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) fentanyl and 5 ml x hr(-1) 1% mepivacaine infusion was started during operation. The VAS pain score (at rest and at coughing), the level of consciousness, respiratory and cardiovascular depression, nausea and vomiting were evaluated for 3 days. RESULTS: The VAS scores at rest were similar in two groups but the VAS scores at coughing were similar or lower in the group iv. In the group iv, five patients suffered from nausea and one patient had somnolence. In the group e, only one patient had nausea but two patients had hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous fentanyl analgesia is safe and possibly more effective than epidural analgesia.

Key concepts: Fentanyl, Medicine, Anesthesia, Nausea, Vomiting, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of intravenous fentanyl analgesia and epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens