Exploring the Statistics and Management of Undergraduate Education Funds
Bai Sheng
Abstract
Bai Sheng
Abstract
There exists the tendency of subjectivity and random in the second-class indicators statistics of education funds in the assessment indicators system of undergraduate education. Only the statistical method with account and project mutually supplementing can ensure the relatively accurate statistics. With this as the starting point, the indicator connotations should be intensified and education funds management be optimized, thereby enhancing the teaching level of the undergraduates.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There exists the tendency of subjectivity and random in the second-class indicators statistics of education funds in the assessment indicators system of undergraduate education. Only the statistical method with account and project mutually supplementing can ensure the relatively accurate statistics. With this as the starting point, the indicator connotations should be intensified and education funds management be optimized, thereby enhancing the teaching level of the undergraduates.
Key concepts: Subjectivity, Class (philosophy), Statistical analysis, Statistics, Point (geometry), Descriptive statistics, Mathematics education, Actuarial science