2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Good Nature and Hypocrisy——On the Thoughts of Temperament Between Mencius and Xun Zi

LI Shi-pin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Mencius stands on theory of good nature and Xun Zi claims that human nature is evil and humanity cannot achieve the good until the process of being artificial. There are differences between them.On the one hand,they talk about the different human nature. Mencius bases on what man is to be man,while Xun Zi thinks the human nature depend on the desires of the senses and then the consequences will lead to evil nature. On the other hand,what good nature they asserted is different. Mencius thinks that anyone has the ability of being good in nature,while Xun Zi based on the results of good in nature,argues that man must go through his efforts to achieve the good. The reasons for their different views originating from different problems they faced. Mencius tries to resolve the fundamental problem of morality,while Xun Zi answeres the way to realize the moral.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mencius stands on theory of good nature and Xun Zi claims that human nature is evil and humanity cannot achieve the good until the process of being artificial. There are differences between them.On the one hand,they talk about the different human nature. Mencius bases on what man is to be man,while Xun Zi thinks the human nature depend on the desires of the senses and then the consequences will lead to evil nature. On the other hand,what good nature they asserted is different. Mencius thinks that anyone has the ability of being good in nature,while Xun Zi based on the results of good in nature,argues that man must go through his efforts to achieve the good. The reasons for their different views originating from different problems they faced. Mencius tries to resolve the fundamental problem of morality,while Xun Zi answeres the way to realize the moral.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mencius stands on theory of good nature and Xun Zi claims that human nature is evil and humanity cannot achieve the good until the process of being artificial. There are differences between them.On the one hand,they talk about the different human nature. Mencius bases on what man is to be man,while Xun Zi thinks the human nature depend on the desires of the senses and then the consequences will lead to evil nature. On the other hand,what good nature they asserted is different. Mencius thinks that anyone has the ability of being good in nature,while Xun Zi based on the results of good in nature,argues that man must go through his efforts to achieve the good. The reasons for their different views originating from different problems they faced. Mencius tries to resolve the fundamental problem of morality,while Xun Zi answeres the way to realize the moral.

Key concepts: Hypocrisy, Humanity, Morality, Form of the Good, Philosophy, Epistemology, Good and evil, Human being

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Good Nature and Hypocrisy——On the Thoughts of Temperament Between Mencius and Xun Zi — Research Paper | ScholarLens