2006Chongqing Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

A randomized and double-blind trial for candesartan cilexetil in treatment of essential hypertension

Rong Hu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestically made candesartan cilexetil in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.Methods: In randomized,double-blind and parallel control trai1,58 patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension randomly received either candesartan cilexetil at 8mg daily(=29) or irbesartan at 150mg daily(=29) for 2 weeks.The patients with poor prognosis in 2weeks(DBP≥90mmHg) received extra 1 tablet daily.Results:Significant differences in the overall response rate of candesartan or irbesartan monotherapy(75.86% VS.37.93%) was found at 2 weeks after treatment.No significant difference in the overall response rate of candesartan or irbesartan monotherapy(89.66% VS.79.33%) was found at 4 weeks after treatment.Significant differences in decreasing the range of systolic pressure in candesartan group or irbesartan group(27.52±11.90mm Hg VS.20.72±9.27 mm Hg) at sitting position and(24.59±11.87 mm Hg VS.15.90±16.22 mm Hg) at standing position were found in at 4 weeks(P0.01;P0.05).Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of domestically produced candesartan cilexetil are similar to those of irbesartan in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.Candesartan cilexetil is preferable to controlling systolic pressure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestically made candesartan cilexetil in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.Methods: In randomized,double-blind and parallel control trai1,58 patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension randomly received either candesartan cilexetil at 8mg daily(=29) or irbesartan at 150mg daily(=29) for 2 weeks.The patients with poor prognosis in 2weeks(DBP≥90mmHg) received extra 1 tablet daily.Results:Significant differences in the overall response rate of candesartan or irbesartan monotherapy(75.86% VS.37.93%) was found at 2 weeks after treatment.No significant difference in the overall response rate of candesartan or irbesartan monotherapy(89.66% VS.79.33%) was found at 4 weeks after treatment.Significant differences in decreasing the range of systolic pressure in candesartan group or irbesartan group(27.52±11.90mm Hg VS.20.72±9.27 mm Hg) at sitting position and(24.59±11.87 mm Hg VS.15.90±16.22 mm Hg) at standing position were found in at 4 weeks(P0.01;P0.05).Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of domestically produced candesartan cilexetil are similar to those of irbesartan in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.Candesartan cilexetil is preferable to controlling systolic pressure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestically made candesartan cilexetil in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.Methods: In randomized,double-blind and parallel control trai1,58 patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension randomly received either candesartan cilexetil at 8mg daily(=29) or irbesartan at 150mg daily(=29) for 2 weeks.The patients with poor prognosis in 2weeks(DBP≥90mmHg) received extra 1 tablet daily.Results:Significant differences in the overall response rate of candesartan or irbesartan monotherapy(75.86% VS.37.93%) was found at 2 weeks after treatment.No significant difference in the overall response rate of candesartan or irbesartan monotherapy(89.66% VS.79.33%) was found at 4 weeks after treatment.Significant differences in decreasing the range of systolic pressure in candesartan group or irbesartan group(27.52±11.90mm Hg VS.20.72±9.27 mm Hg) at sitting position and(24.59±11.87 mm Hg VS.15.90±16.22 mm Hg) at standing position were found in at 4 weeks(P0.01;P0.05).Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of domestically produced candesartan cilexetil are similar to those of irbesartan in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.Candesartan cilexetil is preferable to controlling systolic pressure.

Key concepts: Candesartan, Irbesartan, Medicine, Essential hypertension, Blood pressure, Urology, Internal medicine, Angiotensin II

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A randomized and double-blind trial for candesartan cilexetil in treatment of essential hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens