Regulatory Reform and Competition:Administration of Natural Monopoly Industries
Chunhai Li
Abstract
Chunhai Li
Abstract
The market defects do not mean the market inefficiency or the inevitability of government intervention. The effect is positive theoretically and practically to introduce the market mechanism into the public services. It shows that the administration of natural monopoly industries would rely on both the government and the markets. And the latter is more significant for the transitional countries. The effective competitions and rational regulations can promote to realize the reform objectives.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The market defects do not mean the market inefficiency or the inevitability of government intervention. The effect is positive theoretically and practically to introduce the market mechanism into the public services. It shows that the administration of natural monopoly industries would rely on both the government and the markets. And the latter is more significant for the transitional countries. The effective competitions and rational regulations can promote to realize the reform objectives.
Key concepts: Natural monopoly, Inefficiency, Monopoly, Economic interventionism, Competition (biology), Government (linguistics), Administration (probate law), Economics