Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of seratrodast granules in healthy volunteers
Tian Yong
Abstract
Tian Yong
Abstract
Objective To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of seratrodast in 20 healthy volunteers. Methods A single oral dose 80mg seratrodast of reference or test drugs was given to each volunteer according to an open randomized crossover study. The concentrations in plasma were determined by RP-HPLC method using liquid-liquid extraction methods. Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters of seratrodast were as follows: AUC0-96 were 54.99 ±5.97 and 55.04 ± 6.75 h-mg.L-1; Cmax were 2.63 ± 1.04 and 2.73± 0.96 mg-L-1, tmax were 3.35±0.49 and 3.20 ± 0.89 h; t1/2 were 22.47 ±4.96 and 22.66±3.47 h for test and reference drug, respectively. The relative bioavailability were(101.1±14.4)%, (100.2±13.1)%, respectively. Conclusion The result of statistical analysis showed that two formulations were bioequivalent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of seratrodast in 20 healthy volunteers. Methods A single oral dose 80mg seratrodast of reference or test drugs was given to each volunteer according to an open randomized crossover study. The concentrations in plasma were determined by RP-HPLC method using liquid-liquid extraction methods. Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters of seratrodast were as follows: AUC0-96 were 54.99 ±5.97 and 55.04 ± 6.75 h-mg.L-1; Cmax were 2.63 ± 1.04 and 2.73± 0.96 mg-L-1, tmax were 3.35±0.49 and 3.20 ± 0.89 h; t1/2 were 22.47 ±4.96 and 22.66±3.47 h for test and reference drug, respectively. The relative bioavailability were(101.1±14.4)%, (100.2±13.1)%, respectively. Conclusion The result of statistical analysis showed that two formulations were bioequivalent.
Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Cmax, Volunteer, Crossover study, Pharmacology, High-performance liquid chromatography