2005Unpublished venueRequires access

The Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mass

Jae-Myung Cha, Dong‐Wan Seo, Sang‐Soo Lee, Do-Hyun Park, Jung Sik Choi, Young-Min Ju, Sung‐Koo Lee, Myung‐Hwan Kim, Young‐Il Min

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a technique used to distinguish benign and malignant pancreatic mass histologically. The aim of this study was to determine the value and safety of EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid mass. Methods: The records of forty patients (M:F=24:16, median age: 56 yr) who underwent EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses between October 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed. Histological findings obtained by EUS-FNA were compared with the final diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the rate of complication of EUS-FNA were analyzed. Results: The sites of the lesions were as follows: pancreatic head, n=20 (50%); body, n=10 (25%); tail, n=7 (18%); multifocal, n=3 (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive values were 71%, 78%, 73%, and 64%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% in body lesions, however 65% in head lesions. Transient abdominal pain occurred in one patient (3%) after the procedure; however, there was no case of severe complication. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is shown to be an effective and safe procedure for establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with solid pancreatic masses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a technique used to distinguish benign and malignant pancreatic mass histologically. The aim of this study was to determine the value and safety of EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid mass. Methods: The records of forty patients (M:F=24:16, median age: 56 yr) who underwent EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses between October 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed. Histological findings obtained by EUS-FNA were compared with the final diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the rate of complication of EUS-FNA were analyzed. Results: The sites of the lesions were as follows: pancreatic head, n=20 (50%); body, n=10 (25%); tail, n=7 (18%); multifocal, n=3 (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive values were 71%, 78%, 73%, and 64%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% in body lesions, however 65% in head lesions. Transient abdominal pain occurred in one patient (3%) after the procedure; however, there was no case of severe complication. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is shown to be an effective and safe procedure for establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with solid pancreatic masses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a technique used to distinguish benign and malignant pancreatic mass histologically. The aim of this study was to determine the value and safety of EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid mass. Methods: The records of forty patients (M:F=24:16, median age: 56 yr) who underwent EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses between October 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed. Histological findings obtained by EUS-FNA were compared with the final diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the rate of complication of EUS-FNA were analyzed. Results: The sites of the lesions were as follows: pancreatic head, n=20 (50%); body, n=10 (25%); tail, n=7 (18%); multifocal, n=3 (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive values were 71%, 78%, 73%, and 64%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% in body lesions, however 65% in head lesions. Transient abdominal pain occurred in one patient (3%) after the procedure; however, there was no case of severe complication. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is shown to be an effective and safe procedure for establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with solid pancreatic masses.

Key concepts: Medicine, Fine-needle aspiration, Pancreatic mass, Differential diagnosis, Endoscopic ultrasound, Radiology, Complication, Biopsy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mass — Research Paper | ScholarLens