2008PubMedRequires access

[Evaluation of diagnostic sensitivity of electroneurography for facial neurotmesis].

Zhao Yang, Xin Peng, Qiu Xie

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic sensitivity of electroneurography (ENoG) for facial neurotmesis. METHODS: The data of 24 patients suffering from facial neurotmesis on one side, having non-emergency operation, and having preoperative records of ENoG were collected. Among the patients, 18 were men and 6 were women, aged from 3 to 55 years (median 28). The duration of injury before ENoG examination was from 1 to 56 days (mean 23.6 days) for them. The electroneurographic examination was carried out for facial nerves on both sides preoperatively. Percentages of evoked potential amplitude reduction on affected sides were calculated according to the value of normal side. The 90% reduction of amplitude was used as a cutting point. The facial neurotmesis was observed during operation. The sensitivity and false negative proportions of ENoG were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 24 patients with facial neurotmesis, 22 had ENoG amplitude reduction over 90%, and 2 having this reduction less than 90%. The sensitivity and false negative proportions of ENoG in patients with facial neurotmesis were 91.7% and 8.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: The preoperative ENoG examination is high sensitivity for facial neurotmesis. The patients whose ENoG reduction over 90% should be advised to have a facial neurorrhaphy as soon as possible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic sensitivity of electroneurography (ENoG) for facial neurotmesis. METHODS: The data of 24 patients suffering from facial neurotmesis on one side, having non-emergency operation, and having preoperative records of ENoG were collected. Among the patients, 18 were men and 6 were women, aged from 3 to 55 years (median 28). The duration of injury before ENoG examination was from 1 to 56 days (mean 23.6 days) for them. The electroneurographic examination was carried out for facial nerves on both sides preoperatively. Percentages of evoked potential amplitude reduction on affected sides were calculated according to the value of normal side. The 90% reduction of amplitude was used as a cutting point. The facial neurotmesis was observed during operation. The sensitivity and false negative proportions of ENoG were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 24 patients with facial neurotmesis, 22 had ENoG amplitude reduction over 90%, and 2 having this reduction less than 90%. The sensitivity and false negative proportions of ENoG in patients with facial neurotmesis were 91.7% and 8.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: The preoperative ENoG examination is high sensitivity for facial neurotmesis. The patients whose ENoG reduction over 90% should be advised to have a facial neurorrhaphy as soon as possible.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic sensitivity of electroneurography (ENoG) for facial neurotmesis. METHODS: The data of 24 patients suffering from facial neurotmesis on one side, having non-emergency operation, and having preoperative records of ENoG were collected. Among the patients, 18 were men and 6 were women, aged from 3 to 55 years (median 28). The duration of injury before ENoG examination was from 1 to 56 days (mean 23.6 days) for them. The electroneurographic examination was carried out for facial nerves on both sides preoperatively. Percentages of evoked potential amplitude reduction on affected sides were calculated according to the value of normal side. The 90% reduction of amplitude was used as a cutting point. The facial neurotmesis was observed during operation. The sensitivity and false negative proportions of ENoG were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 24 patients with facial neurotmesis, 22 had ENoG amplitude reduction over 90%, and 2 having this reduction less than 90%. The sensitivity and false negative proportions of ENoG in patients with facial neurotmesis were 91.7% and 8.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: The preoperative ENoG examination is high sensitivity for facial neurotmesis. The patients whose ENoG reduction over 90% should be advised to have a facial neurorrhaphy as soon as possible.

Key concepts: Electroneuronography, Medicine, Reduction (mathematics), Surgery, Anesthesia, Facial nerve, Geometry, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Evaluation of diagnostic sensitivity of electroneurography for facial neurotmesis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens