2013•Journal of Beijing Institute of TechnologyRequires access

The Discourse Space of Chinese Modern Aesthetics and Methodology Transformation

Pei Xua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Chinese modern aesthetics illustrates the interactionof Chinese and Western aesthetics: after ontology and subjective philosophy, Western aesthetics finally broke the subject-object dichotomy epistemology mode of philosophical discourse and the unlimited expansion of subjectivity, and was then represented by imagism and phenomenology, adopting irrationality and using imagistic, intuitive thinking manner, in order to return to experience itself; at the same time, modern China has been introducing Western resources to reshape the aesthetic subject, referring to Western aesthetic theories in the framework, the discourse and the philosophical background of the discipline, as well as using the Enlightenment attitudes and independent aesthetic discourse to reconstruct academic knowledge of aesthetics. This interactive conversion discourse space allows us to conclude that aesthetics from the date of birth was innately related to aesthetic practices, and tried to search the fundamental truth of humanity with sensitivity. At the same time, we witness the loss of classical discourse resources in the development of aesthetics, and we are thus standing on the same starting line with modern Western aesthetics. This fact also provides an opportunity for the transformation and development of modern Chinese aesthetics. Intuitive sensibility and aesthetic culture constitute the bidirectional dimensions of the future development of Chinese and Western aesthetics. The methodology transformation of experience-reflection is also adapted to the needs of the future development of aesthetics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chinese modern aesthetics illustrates the interactionof Chinese and Western aesthetics: after ontology and subjective philosophy, Western aesthetics finally broke the subject-object dichotomy epistemology mode of philosophical discourse and the unlimited expansion of subjectivity, and was then represented by imagism and phenomenology, adopting irrationality and using imagistic, intuitive thinking manner, in order to return to experience itself; at the same time, modern China has been introducing Western resources to reshape the aesthetic subject, referring to Western aesthetic theories in the framework, the discourse and the philosophical background of the discipline, as well as using the Enlightenment attitudes and independent aesthetic discourse to reconstruct academic knowledge of aesthetics. This interactive conversion discourse space allows us to conclude that aesthetics from the date of birth was innately related to aesthetic practices, and tried to search the fundamental truth of humanity with sensitivity. At the same time, we witness the loss of classical discourse resources in the development of aesthetics, and we are thus standing on the same starting line with modern Western aesthetics. This fact also provides an opportunity for the transformation and development of modern Chinese aesthetics. Intuitive sensibility and aesthetic culture constitute the bidirectional dimensions of the future development of Chinese and Western aesthetics. The methodology transformation of experience-reflection is also adapted to the needs of the future development of aesthetics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chinese modern aesthetics illustrates the interactionof Chinese and Western aesthetics: after ontology and subjective philosophy, Western aesthetics finally broke the subject-object dichotomy epistemology mode of philosophical discourse and the unlimited expansion of subjectivity, and was then represented by imagism and phenomenology, adopting irrationality and using imagistic, intuitive thinking manner, in order to return to experience itself; at the same time, modern China has been introducing Western resources to reshape the aesthetic subject, referring to Western aesthetic theories in the framework, the discourse and the philosophical background of the discipline, as well as using the Enlightenment attitudes and independent aesthetic discourse to reconstruct academic knowledge of aesthetics. This interactive conversion discourse space allows us to conclude that aesthetics from the date of birth was innately related to aesthetic practices, and tried to search the fundamental truth of humanity with sensitivity. At the same time, we witness the loss of classical discourse resources in the development of aesthetics, and we are thus standing on the same starting line with modern Western aesthetics. This fact also provides an opportunity for the transformation and development of modern Chinese aesthetics. Intuitive sensibility and aesthetic culture constitute the bidirectional dimensions of the future development of Chinese and Western aesthetics. The methodology transformation of experience-reflection is also adapted to the needs of the future development of aesthetics.

Key concepts: Aesthetics, Everyday Aesthetics, Subjectivity, Sensibility, Enlightenment, Subject (documents), Sociology, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Discourse Space of Chinese Modern Aesthetics and Methodology Transformation — Research Paper | ScholarLens