Neo-confucianism in Qing Dynasty and the Academics
Ling Guo-biao
Abstract
Ling Guo-biao
Abstract
People think currently that Neo-confucianism, as a sort of thinking system, had lost the controlling ability in Qing dynasty. This is the result of lacking the grand view to the passing of national culture. Formally, Neo-confucianism in Qing dynasty returned to ancients, virtually it is a rebirth of traditional theory. It is still the mainstream in the middle time of Qing dynasty.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
People think currently that Neo-confucianism, as a sort of thinking system, had lost the controlling ability in Qing dynasty. This is the result of lacking the grand view to the passing of national culture. Formally, Neo-confucianism in Qing dynasty returned to ancients, virtually it is a rebirth of traditional theory. It is still the mainstream in the middle time of Qing dynasty.
Key concepts: Neo-Confucianism, Mainstream, History, Ancient history, Chinese philosophy, Philosophy, China, Theology