2007Tianjin Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Compared study between one-layer continuous suturing and layer-layer intermittent suturing on closure of abdominal midline incision

Jinlu Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the technique used in abdominal closure with new material. Methods: By comparing 95 cases using single-layer closed technique to stitch peritoneum and lineea alba together with #0 ETHICON loop late absorbed by continuous manner to 75 same-term cases using layered closure technique with silk suture by intermittent manner, the clinical data were collected and analyzed, then the review was made. Results: The single layer closure group: there were no patients suffered peritoneum dehiscence when closing the abdomen, there were no postoperative complications such as wound dehiscence, peritoneum dehiscence and bowel obstruction, incisional hernia etc. There were 5 patients suffered subcutaneous fat liquefy dropsy or wound infection. The layered closure group: there were 10 patients suffered peritoneum dehiscence when closing the abdomen. Bowel obstruction in 1 case. Dehiscence of abdomen wound in 1 cases, 8 patients suffered subcutaneous fat liquefy or dropsy, incisional hernia in 1 patient. Conclusion: This technique is an easy and rapid procedure with less complications, it can deal with some difficult cases in operating such as peritoneum dehiscence, difficult abdomen closure prolonged operative time and etc. It was a favorable choose when performing surgery in the obese, seriously ill or critical patient or the patient who has poor narcotic effect or abdominal muscular tension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To discuss the technique used in abdominal closure with new material. Methods: By comparing 95 cases using single-layer closed technique to stitch peritoneum and lineea alba together with #0 ETHICON loop late absorbed by continuous manner to 75 same-term cases using layered closure technique with silk suture by intermittent manner, the clinical data were collected and analyzed, then the review was made. Results: The single layer closure group: there were no patients suffered peritoneum dehiscence when closing the abdomen, there were no postoperative complications such as wound dehiscence, peritoneum dehiscence and bowel obstruction, incisional hernia etc. There were 5 patients suffered subcutaneous fat liquefy dropsy or wound infection. The layered closure group: there were 10 patients suffered peritoneum dehiscence when closing the abdomen. Bowel obstruction in 1 case. Dehiscence of abdomen wound in 1 cases, 8 patients suffered subcutaneous fat liquefy or dropsy, incisional hernia in 1 patient. Conclusion: This technique is an easy and rapid procedure with less complications, it can deal with some difficult cases in operating such as peritoneum dehiscence, difficult abdomen closure prolonged operative time and etc. It was a favorable choose when performing surgery in the obese, seriously ill or critical patient or the patient who has poor narcotic effect or abdominal muscular tension.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To discuss the technique used in abdominal closure with new material. Methods: By comparing 95 cases using single-layer closed technique to stitch peritoneum and lineea alba together with #0 ETHICON loop late absorbed by continuous manner to 75 same-term cases using layered closure technique with silk suture by intermittent manner, the clinical data were collected and analyzed, then the review was made. Results: The single layer closure group: there were no patients suffered peritoneum dehiscence when closing the abdomen, there were no postoperative complications such as wound dehiscence, peritoneum dehiscence and bowel obstruction, incisional hernia etc. There were 5 patients suffered subcutaneous fat liquefy dropsy or wound infection. The layered closure group: there were 10 patients suffered peritoneum dehiscence when closing the abdomen. Bowel obstruction in 1 case. Dehiscence of abdomen wound in 1 cases, 8 patients suffered subcutaneous fat liquefy or dropsy, incisional hernia in 1 patient. Conclusion: This technique is an easy and rapid procedure with less complications, it can deal with some difficult cases in operating such as peritoneum dehiscence, difficult abdomen closure prolonged operative time and etc. It was a favorable choose when performing surgery in the obese, seriously ill or critical patient or the patient who has poor narcotic effect or abdominal muscular tension.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dehiscence, Surgery, Wound dehiscence, Abdomen, Incisional hernia, Abdominal wall, Hernia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Compared study between one-layer continuous suturing and layer-layer intermittent suturing on closure of abdominal midline incision — Research Paper | ScholarLens