ScholarLens Back to search
2013•Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsRequires access

Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for decreasing wound complications after non-obstetric abdominal operations

Etienne Cassar Delia, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Brian R Davidson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare the benefits and harms of peritoneal closure compared with no peritoneal closure in patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare the benefits and harms of peritoneal closure compared with no peritoneal closure in patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare the benefits and harms of peritoneal closure compared with no peritoneal closure in patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations.

Key concepts: Medicine, Closure (psychology), Surgery, Economics, Market economy

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for decreasing wound complications after non-obstetric abdominal operations — Research Paper | ScholarLens