A Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine Used for Lower Abdominal Surgery
Zheng Hon
Abstract
Zheng Hon
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of spinal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine in patients with lower abdominal surgery.Methods 40 ASA Ⅰ/Ⅱ patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each):group R (the Ropivacaine group) and group B(the Bupivacaine group).Spinal anesthesia was performed at L2-3 interspace.The onset time of sensory block and motor block,duration of analgesia and motor block were recorded.Hemodynamic,side-effects were also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in sensory block between the two groups (P0.05).The onset time of motor block was significantly longer in group R than that in group B.The duration of motor block was significantly shorter in group R than that in group B.Conclusion 0.75% ropivacaine can give a satisfactory clinical effective(P0.01).The duration of motor block was shorter in group R than that in group B.It is beneficial for patients to recovery quickly.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of spinal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine in patients with lower abdominal surgery.Methods 40 ASA Ⅰ/Ⅱ patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each):group R (the Ropivacaine group) and group B(the Bupivacaine group).Spinal anesthesia was performed at L2-3 interspace.The onset time of sensory block and motor block,duration of analgesia and motor block were recorded.Hemodynamic,side-effects were also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in sensory block between the two groups (P0.05).The onset time of motor block was significantly longer in group R than that in group B.The duration of motor block was significantly shorter in group R than that in group B.Conclusion 0.75% ropivacaine can give a satisfactory clinical effective(P0.01).The duration of motor block was shorter in group R than that in group B.It is beneficial for patients to recovery quickly.
Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Motor block, Block (permutation group theory), Spinal anesthesia, Group B