2009Medical RecapitulateRequires access

A Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine Used for Lower Abdominal Surgery

Zheng Hon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of spinal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine in patients with lower abdominal surgery.Methods 40 ASA Ⅰ/Ⅱ patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each):group R (the Ropivacaine group) and group B(the Bupivacaine group).Spinal anesthesia was performed at L2-3 interspace.The onset time of sensory block and motor block,duration of analgesia and motor block were recorded.Hemodynamic,side-effects were also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in sensory block between the two groups (P0.05).The onset time of motor block was significantly longer in group R than that in group B.The duration of motor block was significantly shorter in group R than that in group B.Conclusion 0.75% ropivacaine can give a satisfactory clinical effective(P0.01).The duration of motor block was shorter in group R than that in group B.It is beneficial for patients to recovery quickly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of spinal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine in patients with lower abdominal surgery.Methods 40 ASA Ⅰ/Ⅱ patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each):group R (the Ropivacaine group) and group B(the Bupivacaine group).Spinal anesthesia was performed at L2-3 interspace.The onset time of sensory block and motor block,duration of analgesia and motor block were recorded.Hemodynamic,side-effects were also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in sensory block between the two groups (P0.05).The onset time of motor block was significantly longer in group R than that in group B.The duration of motor block was significantly shorter in group R than that in group B.Conclusion 0.75% ropivacaine can give a satisfactory clinical effective(P0.01).The duration of motor block was shorter in group R than that in group B.It is beneficial for patients to recovery quickly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of spinal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine in patients with lower abdominal surgery.Methods 40 ASA Ⅰ/Ⅱ patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each):group R (the Ropivacaine group) and group B(the Bupivacaine group).Spinal anesthesia was performed at L2-3 interspace.The onset time of sensory block and motor block,duration of analgesia and motor block were recorded.Hemodynamic,side-effects were also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in sensory block between the two groups (P0.05).The onset time of motor block was significantly longer in group R than that in group B.The duration of motor block was significantly shorter in group R than that in group B.Conclusion 0.75% ropivacaine can give a satisfactory clinical effective(P0.01).The duration of motor block was shorter in group R than that in group B.It is beneficial for patients to recovery quickly.

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Motor block, Block (permutation group theory), Spinal anesthesia, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine Used for Lower Abdominal Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens