Application of 0.75% ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia in children
Luo Pin
Abstract
Luo Pin
Abstract
Objective To observe the effects of different doses of ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia, and compare with bupivacaine. Methods Sixty ASAI-Ⅱ children, scheduled for low abdominal surgery and lower limb operations were randomly allocated to three groups ,group A was received 0.75% ropivacaine 0.15mg/ spinal length, group B was received 0.75% ropivacaine 0.3mg/spinal length, group C was received 0.5% bupivacaine 0.15mg/ spinal length. The onset time and duration,the upper level of anesthesia, degree of motor block were recorded , the vital signs of the kids were recorded during the surgery. Results There were statistic differences in the upper level of anesthesia , duration time of T10 sensory block, the fixed time of sensory block, onset time of motor block and the motor recuperation time between group A and group C(F = 0.16,7.03,0.57,19.23,1.17 , P0.05), and group B (F =0.21,6.78,0.78,17.98,1.23, P0.05). The degree of the motor block of group A was weaker than group C(χ2= 40.83,21.16,10.42, P0.05), and group B(χ2= 36.01,21.16,9.60,P0.05). The motor recuperation time of group B was faster than group C(F=1.23,P0.05). There were no differences in onset time of sensory block between group B and the other 2 groups(F= 4.13,4.54, P0.05,).Conclusions 0.3mg/spinal length 0.75% ropivacaine is safe anesthesia for children; 0.15mg/ spinal length ropivacaine is a weaker motor block and sensory block than bupivacaine.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To observe the effects of different doses of ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia, and compare with bupivacaine. Methods Sixty ASAI-Ⅱ children, scheduled for low abdominal surgery and lower limb operations were randomly allocated to three groups ,group A was received 0.75% ropivacaine 0.15mg/ spinal length, group B was received 0.75% ropivacaine 0.3mg/spinal length, group C was received 0.5% bupivacaine 0.15mg/ spinal length. The onset time and duration,the upper level of anesthesia, degree of motor block were recorded , the vital signs of the kids were recorded during the surgery. Results There were statistic differences in the upper level of anesthesia , duration time of T10 sensory block, the fixed time of sensory block, onset time of motor block and the motor recuperation time between group A and group C(F = 0.16,7.03,0.57,19.23,1.17 , P0.05), and group B (F =0.21,6.78,0.78,17.98,1.23, P0.05). The degree of the motor block of group A was weaker than group C(χ2= 40.83,21.16,10.42, P0.05), and group B(χ2= 36.01,21.16,9.60,P0.05). The motor recuperation time of group B was faster than group C(F=1.23,P0.05). There were no differences in onset time of sensory block between group B and the other 2 groups(F= 4.13,4.54, P0.05,).Conclusions 0.3mg/spinal length 0.75% ropivacaine is safe anesthesia for children; 0.15mg/ spinal length ropivacaine is a weaker motor block and sensory block than bupivacaine.
Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Spinal anesthesia, Motor block, Block (permutation group theory), Bupivacaine, Group B