2012Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and LawRequires access

Research on Classification of Presumption and Its Evidentiary Rules

Liu Ji

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Confined to the traditional classification and the simplified explanation for the basis of presumption,the academic research on presumption is still superficial.The application of the presumption in judicial practice is also in a chaotic state.The value of the presumption is based on policy considerations and value measurement rather than probability.Based on its multiple basis,presumption can be divided into the policy-based protective presumption,the policy-based obligatory presumption,the rules-preseted presumption,and presumption of pure probability.Because of their different basis and various relationships with free evaluation of evidence through inner conviction,different types of the presumption have different effect in the law of evidence and requires different rules of disproval.For the difference of civil law and criminal law,even the same type of presumption should have different rules of disproval in the two fields of law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Confined to the traditional classification and the simplified explanation for the basis of presumption,the academic research on presumption is still superficial.The application of the presumption in judicial practice is also in a chaotic state.The value of the presumption is based on policy considerations and value measurement rather than probability.Based on its multiple basis,presumption can be divided into the policy-based protective presumption,the policy-based obligatory presumption,the rules-preseted presumption,and presumption of pure probability.Because of their different basis and various relationships with free evaluation of evidence through inner conviction,different types of the presumption have different effect in the law of evidence and requires different rules of disproval.For the difference of civil law and criminal law,even the same type of presumption should have different rules of disproval in the two fields of law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Confined to the traditional classification and the simplified explanation for the basis of presumption,the academic research on presumption is still superficial.The application of the presumption in judicial practice is also in a chaotic state.The value of the presumption is based on policy considerations and value measurement rather than probability.Based on its multiple basis,presumption can be divided into the policy-based protective presumption,the policy-based obligatory presumption,the rules-preseted presumption,and presumption of pure probability.Because of their different basis and various relationships with free evaluation of evidence through inner conviction,different types of the presumption have different effect in the law of evidence and requires different rules of disproval.For the difference of civil law and criminal law,even the same type of presumption should have different rules of disproval in the two fields of law.

Key concepts: Presumption, Conviction, Law and economics, Law, Value (mathematics), Economics, Political science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research on Classification of Presumption and Its Evidentiary Rules — Research Paper | ScholarLens