2011Shiyong zhongliu zazhiRequires access

Comparison of toxicity of radiotherapy between conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique for newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma

Zhenyu Xiao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the acute toxicity of radiotherapy between conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) technique for newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma. Methods Eighty patients with newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma were treated with conventional radiotherapy or IMRT from Feb 2009 to Jan 2011.Acute toxicities including acute skin reaction,acute radiation-induced mucositis,hematological toxicity,trismus and xerostomia were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of the acute skin reaction,xerostomia and trismus in conventional radiotherapy group was significantly higher than in the IMRT group.The incidence of mucositis and hematological toxicity was similar in the two groups. Conclusion IMRT can significantly reduce the incidence of acute radiation dermatitis,trismus and xerostomia,while the incidence of mucositis and hematological toxicity is similar in the two groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the acute toxicity of radiotherapy between conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) technique for newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma. Methods Eighty patients with newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma were treated with conventional radiotherapy or IMRT from Feb 2009 to Jan 2011.Acute toxicities including acute skin reaction,acute radiation-induced mucositis,hematological toxicity,trismus and xerostomia were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of the acute skin reaction,xerostomia and trismus in conventional radiotherapy group was significantly higher than in the IMRT group.The incidence of mucositis and hematological toxicity was similar in the two groups. Conclusion IMRT can significantly reduce the incidence of acute radiation dermatitis,trismus and xerostomia,while the incidence of mucositis and hematological toxicity is similar in the two groups.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the acute toxicity of radiotherapy between conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) technique for newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma. Methods Eighty patients with newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma were treated with conventional radiotherapy or IMRT from Feb 2009 to Jan 2011.Acute toxicities including acute skin reaction,acute radiation-induced mucositis,hematological toxicity,trismus and xerostomia were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of the acute skin reaction,xerostomia and trismus in conventional radiotherapy group was significantly higher than in the IMRT group.The incidence of mucositis and hematological toxicity was similar in the two groups. Conclusion IMRT can significantly reduce the incidence of acute radiation dermatitis,trismus and xerostomia,while the incidence of mucositis and hematological toxicity is similar in the two groups.

Key concepts: Mucositis, Trismus, Medicine, Radiation therapy, Acute toxicity, Incidence (geometry), Toxicity, Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of toxicity of radiotherapy between conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique for newly diagnosed nasopharygeal carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens