2011Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and RehabilitationRequires access

A comparative observation of acute adverse reaction of IMRT and conventional radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Chen Yan-pin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the acute adverse reaction of radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma using conventional or intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT).Methods Sixty newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were randomized to 2 groups:conventional radiotherapy group(n=33)and IMRT group(n=27).Acute toxic reactions including acute skin reaction,xerostomia,oral mucositis and acute parotid edema were observed.Results The incidences of acute skin reaction,xerostomia and acute parotid edema in IMRT group were significantly lower than those in the conventional radiotherapy group,the incidence of oral mucositis was similar in the 2 groups.Conclusion IMRT can significantly reduce the incidences of acute skin reaction,xerostomia and acute parotid edema compared with conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the acute adverse reaction of radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma using conventional or intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT).Methods Sixty newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were randomized to 2 groups:conventional radiotherapy group(n=33)and IMRT group(n=27).Acute toxic reactions including acute skin reaction,xerostomia,oral mucositis and acute parotid edema were observed.Results The incidences of acute skin reaction,xerostomia and acute parotid edema in IMRT group were significantly lower than those in the conventional radiotherapy group,the incidence of oral mucositis was similar in the 2 groups.Conclusion IMRT can significantly reduce the incidences of acute skin reaction,xerostomia and acute parotid edema compared with conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the acute adverse reaction of radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma using conventional or intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT).Methods Sixty newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were randomized to 2 groups:conventional radiotherapy group(n=33)and IMRT group(n=27).Acute toxic reactions including acute skin reaction,xerostomia,oral mucositis and acute parotid edema were observed.Results The incidences of acute skin reaction,xerostomia and acute parotid edema in IMRT group were significantly lower than those in the conventional radiotherapy group,the incidence of oral mucositis was similar in the 2 groups.Conclusion IMRT can significantly reduce the incidences of acute skin reaction,xerostomia and acute parotid edema compared with conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Key concepts: Medicine, Mucositis, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Radiation therapy, Adverse effect, Edema, Incidence (geometry), Parotid gland

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative observation of acute adverse reaction of IMRT and conventional radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens