2009Anhui nongye kexueRequires access

Two Improved Extraction Methods of DNA in Unknown Bacteria

Qingrong Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to study the extraction method of DNA in bacteria so as to supply methodological support for studying unknown bacteria.[Method] The 2 extraction methods of DNA in bacteria were compared in aspects such as purity of DNA,enzyme digestion effect of genome DNA and gene amplification of 16S rRNA.[Result] The purity of DNA(OD260/OD280)extracted by method 1 was between 1.51 and 1.65 and the average purity of the 6 samples was 1.56.The purity of DNA extracted by method 2 was between 1.25 and 1.41 and the average purity of the 6 samples was 1.33.The purity of DNA extracted by method 1 was higher,but its expeirmental procedure was a little tedious.The expeirmental procedure of method 2 was a little simple,but its experimental duration was longer.The genome DNA longer than 21 kb in bateria was extracted by the 2 methods.The bands with length being about 600 bp were obtained from the PCR amplification of DNA extracted by the 2 methods and their amplification effects were better.[Conclusion] The quality of DNA extracted by the 2 methods was relatively high and both of them could be used in RFLP and PCR study directly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective] The aim was to study the extraction method of DNA in bacteria so as to supply methodological support for studying unknown bacteria.[Method] The 2 extraction methods of DNA in bacteria were compared in aspects such as purity of DNA,enzyme digestion effect of genome DNA and gene amplification of 16S rRNA.[Result] The purity of DNA(OD260/OD280)extracted by method 1 was between 1.51 and 1.65 and the average purity of the 6 samples was 1.56.The purity of DNA extracted by method 2 was between 1.25 and 1.41 and the average purity of the 6 samples was 1.33.The purity of DNA extracted by method 1 was higher,but its expeirmental procedure was a little tedious.The expeirmental procedure of method 2 was a little simple,but its experimental duration was longer.The genome DNA longer than 21 kb in bateria was extracted by the 2 methods.The bands with length being about 600 bp were obtained from the PCR amplification of DNA extracted by the 2 methods and their amplification effects were better.[Conclusion] The quality of DNA extracted by the 2 methods was relatively high and both of them could be used in RFLP and PCR study directly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective] The aim was to study the extraction method of DNA in bacteria so as to supply methodological support for studying unknown bacteria.[Method] The 2 extraction methods of DNA in bacteria were compared in aspects such as purity of DNA,enzyme digestion effect of genome DNA and gene amplification of 16S rRNA.[Result] The purity of DNA(OD260/OD280)extracted by method 1 was between 1.51 and 1.65 and the average purity of the 6 samples was 1.56.The purity of DNA extracted by method 2 was between 1.25 and 1.41 and the average purity of the 6 samples was 1.33.The purity of DNA extracted by method 1 was higher,but its expeirmental procedure was a little tedious.The expeirmental procedure of method 2 was a little simple,but its experimental duration was longer.The genome DNA longer than 21 kb in bateria was extracted by the 2 methods.The bands with length being about 600 bp were obtained from the PCR amplification of DNA extracted by the 2 methods and their amplification effects were better.[Conclusion] The quality of DNA extracted by the 2 methods was relatively high and both of them could be used in RFLP and PCR study directly.

Key concepts: DNA, DNA extraction, Bacteria, Chromatography, Extraction (chemistry), Biology, Polymerase chain reaction, Molecular biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two Improved Extraction Methods of DNA in Unknown Bacteria — Research Paper | ScholarLens