2013•Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and LawRequires access

New Path of Amending the Capital Majority Decision

Cai Yi-b

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Though the rule of the Capital Majority plays a cornerstone role in the company's operation of the process,but in the process of corporate practice,due to inherent conflict between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders,resulted in the controlling shareholder bullying or getting large profits on small risk.It is not conducive to the company's long-term operation and development.Analyzes the legal basis of the majority rule,and then come to the conclusions of two solutions to this problem: to cultivate equity culture within the San Miguel,the second is to strengthen the fiduciary obligations of the controlling shareholder so that construct a relatively fair theory system and use of the balance between the two to restrict the controlling shareholders,thus achieving a maximum possible balance between the controlling shareholders' and minority shareholders' rights.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Though the rule of the Capital Majority plays a cornerstone role in the company's operation of the process,but in the process of corporate practice,due to inherent conflict between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders,resulted in the controlling shareholder bullying or getting large profits on small risk.It is not conducive to the company's long-term operation and development.Analyzes the legal basis of the majority rule,and then come to the conclusions of two solutions to this problem: to cultivate equity culture within the San Miguel,the second is to strengthen the fiduciary obligations of the controlling shareholder so that construct a relatively fair theory system and use of the balance between the two to restrict the controlling shareholders,thus achieving a maximum possible balance between the controlling shareholders' and minority shareholders' rights.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Though the rule of the Capital Majority plays a cornerstone role in the company's operation of the process,but in the process of corporate practice,due to inherent conflict between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders,resulted in the controlling shareholder bullying or getting large profits on small risk.It is not conducive to the company's long-term operation and development.Analyzes the legal basis of the majority rule,and then come to the conclusions of two solutions to this problem: to cultivate equity culture within the San Miguel,the second is to strengthen the fiduciary obligations of the controlling shareholder so that construct a relatively fair theory system and use of the balance between the two to restrict the controlling shareholders,thus achieving a maximum possible balance between the controlling shareholders' and minority shareholders' rights.

Key concepts: Shareholder, Fiduciary, Equity (law), Business, Corporate law, Capital (architecture), Balance (ability), Equity capital

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New Path of Amending the Capital Majority Decision — Research Paper | ScholarLens