2007Xinxiang yixueyuan xuebaoRequires access

Control study of diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia by esophageal electrophysiology and intracardiac electrophysiology

Yahui Song

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the accuracy of diagnosis and classification of supraventricular tachycardia(SVT)by esophageal electrophysiology.Methods Results of esophageal electrophysiology and intracardiac electrophysiology in 192 patients with SVT were compared.Results Diagnosis of dual atrioventricular nodal pathway(DAVNP),atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT),left accessory pathway(LAP) and right accessory pathway(RAP) as well as orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia(OAVRT) were no significant difference between these two electrophysiology study;but diagnostic rate of septal AP(SAP) mediated AVRT and atrial tachycardia(AT) by esophageal electrophysiology were lower than that by intracardiac electrophysiology.Conclusion Esophageal electrophysilolgy has the similar accuracy of diagnosis and classification of common SVT to intracardiac electrophysiology,and has advantages of noninvasiveness,simplicity and low cost,etc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the accuracy of diagnosis and classification of supraventricular tachycardia(SVT)by esophageal electrophysiology.Methods Results of esophageal electrophysiology and intracardiac electrophysiology in 192 patients with SVT were compared.Results Diagnosis of dual atrioventricular nodal pathway(DAVNP),atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT),left accessory pathway(LAP) and right accessory pathway(RAP) as well as orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia(OAVRT) were no significant difference between these two electrophysiology study;but diagnostic rate of septal AP(SAP) mediated AVRT and atrial tachycardia(AT) by esophageal electrophysiology were lower than that by intracardiac electrophysiology.Conclusion Esophageal electrophysilolgy has the similar accuracy of diagnosis and classification of common SVT to intracardiac electrophysiology,and has advantages of noninvasiveness,simplicity and low cost,etc.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the accuracy of diagnosis and classification of supraventricular tachycardia(SVT)by esophageal electrophysiology.Methods Results of esophageal electrophysiology and intracardiac electrophysiology in 192 patients with SVT were compared.Results Diagnosis of dual atrioventricular nodal pathway(DAVNP),atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT),left accessory pathway(LAP) and right accessory pathway(RAP) as well as orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia(OAVRT) were no significant difference between these two electrophysiology study;but diagnostic rate of septal AP(SAP) mediated AVRT and atrial tachycardia(AT) by esophageal electrophysiology were lower than that by intracardiac electrophysiology.Conclusion Esophageal electrophysilolgy has the similar accuracy of diagnosis and classification of common SVT to intracardiac electrophysiology,and has advantages of noninvasiveness,simplicity and low cost,etc.

Key concepts: Electrophysiology, Intracardiac injection, Electrophysiology study, Tachycardia, Medicine, Orthodromic, Supraventricular tachycardia, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Control study of diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia by esophageal electrophysiology and intracardiac electrophysiology — Research Paper | ScholarLens