On the Administrative and Judicial Functions of International Court
Deng Lie
Abstract
Deng Lie
Abstract
It's widely held in the academic circle that the judicial functions of the international court are to resolve the country conflict and to provide counseling for the United Nations agencies. Yet, our studies show that the international court has actually established a comprehensive judicial solution mechanism for the cases between the court authority and the court staff by means of its secondary law making. This means that, beside the two judicial functions mentioned before, the international court has an administrative function, which turns the international court into its own administrative court. The author holds that, though this development is necessary and beneficial to the international court, it invites theoretical doubts and goes against the International Court Convention, which is worthy of close attention.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It's widely held in the academic circle that the judicial functions of the international court are to resolve the country conflict and to provide counseling for the United Nations agencies. Yet, our studies show that the international court has actually established a comprehensive judicial solution mechanism for the cases between the court authority and the court staff by means of its secondary law making. This means that, beside the two judicial functions mentioned before, the international court has an administrative function, which turns the international court into its own administrative court. The author holds that, though this development is necessary and beneficial to the international court, it invites theoretical doubts and goes against the International Court Convention, which is worthy of close attention.
Key concepts: Law, Court of record, International court, Political science, Court of equity, Majority opinion, International law, Convention