2007•Zhongguo yaofangRequires access

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Schemes for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Limin Dong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To compare the pharmacoeconomic effects of three antibacterial drug therapies for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection(LRTI).METHODS:A total of 110 LRTI patients were randomized to Group A(azithromyc-in),Group B(amoxicillin/sulbactam) or Group C(levofloxacin) with a course of treatment at 10 days for each Group.A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the evaluation of the three schemes.RESULTS:The total costs of three schemes were 640.00 yuan,696.00 yuan and 376.00 yuan,respectively;the effective rate were 83.3%,85.7% and 82.1%,respectively(P0.05);the cost-effectiveness ratios were 768.31,812.14 and 457.98,respectively.CONCLUSION:Scheme C was proved to be the best therapeutic regime.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE:To compare the pharmacoeconomic effects of three antibacterial drug therapies for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection(LRTI).METHODS:A total of 110 LRTI patients were randomized to Group A(azithromyc-in),Group B(amoxicillin/sulbactam) or Group C(levofloxacin) with a course of treatment at 10 days for each Group.A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the evaluation of the three schemes.RESULTS:The total costs of three schemes were 640.00 yuan,696.00 yuan and 376.00 yuan,respectively;the effective rate were 83.3%,85.7% and 82.1%,respectively(P0.05);the cost-effectiveness ratios were 768.31,812.14 and 457.98,respectively.CONCLUSION:Scheme C was proved to be the best therapeutic regime.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE:To compare the pharmacoeconomic effects of three antibacterial drug therapies for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection(LRTI).METHODS:A total of 110 LRTI patients were randomized to Group A(azithromyc-in),Group B(amoxicillin/sulbactam) or Group C(levofloxacin) with a course of treatment at 10 days for each Group.A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the evaluation of the three schemes.RESULTS:The total costs of three schemes were 640.00 yuan,696.00 yuan and 376.00 yuan,respectively;the effective rate were 83.3%,85.7% and 82.1%,respectively(P0.05);the cost-effectiveness ratios were 768.31,812.14 and 457.98,respectively.CONCLUSION:Scheme C was proved to be the best therapeutic regime.

Key concepts: Levofloxacin, Medicine, Lower respiratory tract infection, Amoxicillin, Respiratory tract infections, Internal medicine, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Schemes for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens