2011•Zhongguo yiyuan ganranxue zazhiRequires access

Clinical effects of domestic cefepime and imported cefepime on treatment of respiratory tract infections:a meta-analysis

Guo Yong-yi, Yaoyong Zhou, Bin Chen, Weiming Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effect of domestic cefepime versus imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.METHODS Searching CNKI database from 1993 to 2008,the published domestic literature focusing on randomized controlled trials(RCT) of domestic cefepime and imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections were collected.The selected literature was assessed based on the demand of a meta-analysis by RevMan 4.2.RESULTS Five RCTs were identified.The cure rate,total effective rate,and bacterial eradication rate were 62.70%,96.48%,95.77% and 58.72%,90.64%,95.21%,respectively.The pooled OR were 1.20(95%CI 0.81~1.78,P=0.37)、2.75(95%CI 1.21~6.26,P=0.02) and 1.14(95%CI 0.46~2.78,P=0.78).The cure rate and bacterial eradication rate were similar in the two groups,but the two groups produced significance in total effective rate.CONCLUSION There are similar clinical results of domestic cefepime versus imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections,Even the domestic cefepime gives a higher effective rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effect of domestic cefepime versus imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.METHODS Searching CNKI database from 1993 to 2008,the published domestic literature focusing on randomized controlled trials(RCT) of domestic cefepime and imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections were collected.The selected literature was assessed based on the demand of a meta-analysis by RevMan 4.2.RESULTS Five RCTs were identified.The cure rate,total effective rate,and bacterial eradication rate were 62.70%,96.48%,95.77% and 58.72%,90.64%,95.21%,respectively.The pooled OR were 1.20(95%CI 0.81~1.78,P=0.37)、2.75(95%CI 1.21~6.26,P=0.02) and 1.14(95%CI 0.46~2.78,P=0.78).The cure rate and bacterial eradication rate were similar in the two groups,but the two groups produced significance in total effective rate.CONCLUSION There are similar clinical results of domestic cefepime versus imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections,Even the domestic cefepime gives a higher effective rate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effect of domestic cefepime versus imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.METHODS Searching CNKI database from 1993 to 2008,the published domestic literature focusing on randomized controlled trials(RCT) of domestic cefepime and imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections were collected.The selected literature was assessed based on the demand of a meta-analysis by RevMan 4.2.RESULTS Five RCTs were identified.The cure rate,total effective rate,and bacterial eradication rate were 62.70%,96.48%,95.77% and 58.72%,90.64%,95.21%,respectively.The pooled OR were 1.20(95%CI 0.81~1.78,P=0.37)、2.75(95%CI 1.21~6.26,P=0.02) and 1.14(95%CI 0.46~2.78,P=0.78).The cure rate and bacterial eradication rate were similar in the two groups,but the two groups produced significance in total effective rate.CONCLUSION There are similar clinical results of domestic cefepime versus imported cefepime in the treatment of respiratory tract infections,Even the domestic cefepime gives a higher effective rate.

Key concepts: Cefepime, Respiratory tract infections, Meta-analysis, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Internal medicine, Antibiotics, Respiratory system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effects of domestic cefepime and imported cefepime on treatment of respiratory tract infections:a meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens