2009Journal of clinical and experimental medicineRequires access

Analysis of clinical management of 91 patients with traumatic flail chest.

Bin Mu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the treatments and clinical outcomes and summarize the experience in the treatment of traumatic flail chest.Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 91 patients with traumatic flail chest hospitalized in our hospital from January 1995 to June 2008.Results Although there was no significant difference in the severity of injury between group Ⅰand group Ⅱ,the death rate of patients in groupⅠin which patients underwent less invasive treatment was higher(7 deaths,25%) than that in group Ⅱ(4 deaths,6.3%)(P0.05).The condition of the patients in invasive treatment group was more severe than that in conservative treatment group,however,there was no significant mortality difference between invasive treatment group and conservative treatment group(P0.05).The ratio of the chest wall deformation and the incidence of pulmonary atelectasis in invasive treatment group were less than those in conservative group.Conclusion The therapeutic effect of invasive treatment was better than that of conservative treatment.The key treatment measures are to restore stability of the chest wall at an early stage,effectively treat pulmonary contusion,and ensure non-obstruction of the airway plus effective pain relief,prevent and treat the insufficiency of respiration and pulmonary infection.Mechanical ventilation should be administered to patients when necessary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the treatments and clinical outcomes and summarize the experience in the treatment of traumatic flail chest.Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 91 patients with traumatic flail chest hospitalized in our hospital from January 1995 to June 2008.Results Although there was no significant difference in the severity of injury between group Ⅰand group Ⅱ,the death rate of patients in groupⅠin which patients underwent less invasive treatment was higher(7 deaths,25%) than that in group Ⅱ(4 deaths,6.3%)(P0.05).The condition of the patients in invasive treatment group was more severe than that in conservative treatment group,however,there was no significant mortality difference between invasive treatment group and conservative treatment group(P0.05).The ratio of the chest wall deformation and the incidence of pulmonary atelectasis in invasive treatment group were less than those in conservative group.Conclusion The therapeutic effect of invasive treatment was better than that of conservative treatment.The key treatment measures are to restore stability of the chest wall at an early stage,effectively treat pulmonary contusion,and ensure non-obstruction of the airway plus effective pain relief,prevent and treat the insufficiency of respiration and pulmonary infection.Mechanical ventilation should be administered to patients when necessary.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the treatments and clinical outcomes and summarize the experience in the treatment of traumatic flail chest.Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 91 patients with traumatic flail chest hospitalized in our hospital from January 1995 to June 2008.Results Although there was no significant difference in the severity of injury between group Ⅰand group Ⅱ,the death rate of patients in groupⅠin which patients underwent less invasive treatment was higher(7 deaths,25%) than that in group Ⅱ(4 deaths,6.3%)(P0.05).The condition of the patients in invasive treatment group was more severe than that in conservative treatment group,however,there was no significant mortality difference between invasive treatment group and conservative treatment group(P0.05).The ratio of the chest wall deformation and the incidence of pulmonary atelectasis in invasive treatment group were less than those in conservative group.Conclusion The therapeutic effect of invasive treatment was better than that of conservative treatment.The key treatment measures are to restore stability of the chest wall at an early stage,effectively treat pulmonary contusion,and ensure non-obstruction of the airway plus effective pain relief,prevent and treat the insufficiency of respiration and pulmonary infection.Mechanical ventilation should be administered to patients when necessary.

Key concepts: Medicine, Flail chest, Conservative treatment, Atelectasis, Surgery, Incidence (geometry), Airway obstruction, Mechanical ventilation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of clinical management of 91 patients with traumatic flail chest. — Research Paper | ScholarLens