2007•Journal of Chongqing Institute of TechnologyRequires access

Legal Thinking,Legal Education and Legal Logic Teaching

Zhang Jing-huan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The legal thinking is composed of legal thinking form and legal thinking content. The professional legal courses teach the legal thinking content and legal logic teaches legal thinking form. Each has their emphasis, but in raising students’ legal thinking ability, and training students’ legal thinking, legal thinking form and legal thinking content are interdependent. The melting of legal logic teaching into legal thinking content, paying attention to legal thinking form, methods and laws in delivering profession legal courses, promote students’ legal thinking ability, so as to realize the goals of legal education. There are several perspectives in legal logic teaching: teaching both general logic and dialectic logic knowledge to search for the life of law; stressing self-discipline consciousness of logic to arouse students’ attention for the course; and analyzing cases from a legal logic perspective to facilitate students’ study expectations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The legal thinking is composed of legal thinking form and legal thinking content. The professional legal courses teach the legal thinking content and legal logic teaches legal thinking form. Each has their emphasis, but in raising students’ legal thinking ability, and training students’ legal thinking, legal thinking form and legal thinking content are interdependent. The melting of legal logic teaching into legal thinking content, paying attention to legal thinking form, methods and laws in delivering profession legal courses, promote students’ legal thinking ability, so as to realize the goals of legal education. There are several perspectives in legal logic teaching: teaching both general logic and dialectic logic knowledge to search for the life of law; stressing self-discipline consciousness of logic to arouse students’ attention for the course; and analyzing cases from a legal logic perspective to facilitate students’ study expectations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The legal thinking is composed of legal thinking form and legal thinking content. The professional legal courses teach the legal thinking content and legal logic teaches legal thinking form. Each has their emphasis, but in raising students’ legal thinking ability, and training students’ legal thinking, legal thinking form and legal thinking content are interdependent. The melting of legal logic teaching into legal thinking content, paying attention to legal thinking form, methods and laws in delivering profession legal courses, promote students’ legal thinking ability, so as to realize the goals of legal education. There are several perspectives in legal logic teaching: teaching both general logic and dialectic logic knowledge to search for the life of law; stressing self-discipline consciousness of logic to arouse students’ attention for the course; and analyzing cases from a legal logic perspective to facilitate students’ study expectations.

Key concepts: Legal realism, Legal profession, Empirical legal studies, Legal writing, Legal formalism, Legal education, Legal research, Legal psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Thinking,Legal Education and Legal Logic Teaching — Research Paper | ScholarLens