On Legitimacy of Judiciary Reform
Shi Li-mei
Abstract
Shi Li-mei
Abstract
The judiciary reform of China has been proceeded for more than twenty years till now. But recently, the legitimacy of our judiciary reform has been occasionally oppugned by scholars. Judiciary reform as a legal activity, should follow the principle of legitimacy, but legitimacy does not mean that the reform must be limited to the existing law. Legitimacy is not legality; it includes two aspects: the form and the essence. It is important to rebuild the theory of legitimacy to resolve the legitimacy crisis of our judiciary reform.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The judiciary reform of China has been proceeded for more than twenty years till now. But recently, the legitimacy of our judiciary reform has been occasionally oppugned by scholars. Judiciary reform as a legal activity, should follow the principle of legitimacy, but legitimacy does not mean that the reform must be limited to the existing law. Legitimacy is not legality; it includes two aspects: the form and the essence. It is important to rebuild the theory of legitimacy to resolve the legitimacy crisis of our judiciary reform.
Key concepts: Legitimacy, Principle of legality, Political science, Law, China, Law and economics, Sociology, Politics