2003•The Korean journal of painRequires access

Comparison of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Added to Ropivacaine for Patient-Controlled Thoracic Epidural Analgesia

Donghee Kim, Seung-Hwan Kang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Background: The analgesic effects and side effects of epidural sufentanil and fentanyl, combined with ropivacaine, for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), were compared in post-thoracotomy patients. Methods: In a double blind trial, 40 patients received either sufentanil, 0.83 (group S), or fentanyl, 4 (group F), added to 0.15% ropivacaine, for PCEA following a thoracic operation. The PCEA setting was a 4 ml loading dose, 4 ml bolus dose, 4 ml/h BACKGROUND infusion and a 10 min lockout interval, at 4 bolus limit per hour, with a total volume of 300 ml. The pain scores and side effects were recorded at 6, 12 and 24 hr after the operation. Results: In group S, the analgesic efficacy was significantly higher between 12 and 24 hr after the operation than in group F (P , was administered epidurally, with 0.15% ropivacaine, the improvement in the analgesic effect was better than that for fentanyl, 4, with no significant side effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The analgesic effects and side effects of epidural sufentanil and fentanyl, combined with ropivacaine, for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), were compared in post-thoracotomy patients. Methods: In a double blind trial, 40 patients received either sufentanil, 0.83 (group S), or fentanyl, 4 (group F), added to 0.15% ropivacaine, for PCEA following a thoracic operation. The PCEA setting was a 4 ml loading dose, 4 ml bolus dose, 4 ml/h BACKGROUND infusion and a 10 min lockout interval, at 4 bolus limit per hour, with a total volume of 300 ml. The pain scores and side effects were recorded at 6, 12 and 24 hr after the operation. Results: In group S, the analgesic efficacy was significantly higher between 12 and 24 hr after the operation than in group F (P , was administered epidurally, with 0.15% ropivacaine, the improvement in the analgesic effect was better than that for fentanyl, 4, with no significant side effects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The analgesic effects and side effects of epidural sufentanil and fentanyl, combined with ropivacaine, for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), were compared in post-thoracotomy patients. Methods: In a double blind trial, 40 patients received either sufentanil, 0.83 (group S), or fentanyl, 4 (group F), added to 0.15% ropivacaine, for PCEA following a thoracic operation. The PCEA setting was a 4 ml loading dose, 4 ml bolus dose, 4 ml/h BACKGROUND infusion and a 10 min lockout interval, at 4 bolus limit per hour, with a total volume of 300 ml. The pain scores and side effects were recorded at 6, 12 and 24 hr after the operation. Results: In group S, the analgesic efficacy was significantly higher between 12 and 24 hr after the operation than in group F (P , was administered epidurally, with 0.15% ropivacaine, the improvement in the analgesic effect was better than that for fentanyl, 4, with no significant side effects.

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Sufentanil, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Bolus (digestion), Analgesic, Morphine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Added to Ropivacaine for Patient-Controlled Thoracic Epidural Analgesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens