2011Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Comparative analysis of detection methods of syphilis

Wei Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the syphilis infection situation,and to evaluate syphilis testing methods and provide an appropriate intervention and laboratory testing strategy.Methods We took rapid plasma reagin(RPR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) as the testing methods and positive results were confirmed with treponema pallidum agglutination test(TPPA).Results There were 596 serum samples this year(319 in the first half year and 277 in the rest).Among the 45 TPPA positive samples,16 samples turned out to be positive under the method of RPR with a sensitivity rate of 35.56%.While using ELISA there were 43 positive cases with a sensitivity rate of 95.56%.Among the 21 RPR positive samples,3 were confirmed as negative,with specificity of 99.16%.While among the 46 ELISA positive samples,5 were confirmed negative,with specificity of 99.50%.There was a significant difference between the positive results of RPR and TPPA(P0.05),but not between ELISA and TPPA(P0.05).Conclusion ELISA testing measurement is more advantageous than RPR with its higher sensitivity and better sensitivity,so it can be an ideal measurement method for syphilis detection and important for controlling syphilis by sex.However,a confirmative test should be made to ELISA positive samples by TPPA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the syphilis infection situation,and to evaluate syphilis testing methods and provide an appropriate intervention and laboratory testing strategy.Methods We took rapid plasma reagin(RPR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) as the testing methods and positive results were confirmed with treponema pallidum agglutination test(TPPA).Results There were 596 serum samples this year(319 in the first half year and 277 in the rest).Among the 45 TPPA positive samples,16 samples turned out to be positive under the method of RPR with a sensitivity rate of 35.56%.While using ELISA there were 43 positive cases with a sensitivity rate of 95.56%.Among the 21 RPR positive samples,3 were confirmed as negative,with specificity of 99.16%.While among the 46 ELISA positive samples,5 were confirmed negative,with specificity of 99.50%.There was a significant difference between the positive results of RPR and TPPA(P0.05),but not between ELISA and TPPA(P0.05).Conclusion ELISA testing measurement is more advantageous than RPR with its higher sensitivity and better sensitivity,so it can be an ideal measurement method for syphilis detection and important for controlling syphilis by sex.However,a confirmative test should be made to ELISA positive samples by TPPA.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the syphilis infection situation,and to evaluate syphilis testing methods and provide an appropriate intervention and laboratory testing strategy.Methods We took rapid plasma reagin(RPR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) as the testing methods and positive results were confirmed with treponema pallidum agglutination test(TPPA).Results There were 596 serum samples this year(319 in the first half year and 277 in the rest).Among the 45 TPPA positive samples,16 samples turned out to be positive under the method of RPR with a sensitivity rate of 35.56%.While using ELISA there were 43 positive cases with a sensitivity rate of 95.56%.Among the 21 RPR positive samples,3 were confirmed as negative,with specificity of 99.16%.While among the 46 ELISA positive samples,5 were confirmed negative,with specificity of 99.50%.There was a significant difference between the positive results of RPR and TPPA(P0.05),but not between ELISA and TPPA(P0.05).Conclusion ELISA testing measurement is more advantageous than RPR with its higher sensitivity and better sensitivity,so it can be an ideal measurement method for syphilis detection and important for controlling syphilis by sex.However,a confirmative test should be made to ELISA positive samples by TPPA.

Key concepts: Rapid plasma reagin, Syphilis, Treponema, Medicine, Internal medicine, Immunology, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of detection methods of syphilis — Research Paper | ScholarLens