2007•Radiologic PracticeRequires access

Comparison of the Clinical Value of Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Ureterolithiasis

Min Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To study the diagnostic value of ultrasonography and radiography for ureterolithyiasis. Methods: From 2004.10 to 2005.10,120 patients with ureterolithiasis were examined by ultrasonography and radiography.There were unilateral ureterolith in 196 patients and bilateral ureterolith in 4 patients.Two patients were proved by surgery,11 patients were proved by ureterorenoscopy,in 107 patients the ureterolith was expelled.The ultrasonographic diagnosis was compared with that of radiography including abdominal plain film (KUB) and intravenous pyelography (IVP).Results: 92.7% of the ureteroliths were detected by ultrasonography,the accuracy of detectability was higher than that of KUB and IVP (62%).Furthermore,ultrasonography provided more direct information of the urinary system and their associated abnormalities which could not be revealed by radiography.Conclusion:Ultrasonography is the method of first choice of imaging investigation for ureterolithiasis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To study the diagnostic value of ultrasonography and radiography for ureterolithyiasis. Methods: From 2004.10 to 2005.10,120 patients with ureterolithiasis were examined by ultrasonography and radiography.There were unilateral ureterolith in 196 patients and bilateral ureterolith in 4 patients.Two patients were proved by surgery,11 patients were proved by ureterorenoscopy,in 107 patients the ureterolith was expelled.The ultrasonographic diagnosis was compared with that of radiography including abdominal plain film (KUB) and intravenous pyelography (IVP).Results: 92.7% of the ureteroliths were detected by ultrasonography,the accuracy of detectability was higher than that of KUB and IVP (62%).Furthermore,ultrasonography provided more direct information of the urinary system and their associated abnormalities which could not be revealed by radiography.Conclusion:Ultrasonography is the method of first choice of imaging investigation for ureterolithiasis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To study the diagnostic value of ultrasonography and radiography for ureterolithyiasis. Methods: From 2004.10 to 2005.10,120 patients with ureterolithiasis were examined by ultrasonography and radiography.There were unilateral ureterolith in 196 patients and bilateral ureterolith in 4 patients.Two patients were proved by surgery,11 patients were proved by ureterorenoscopy,in 107 patients the ureterolith was expelled.The ultrasonographic diagnosis was compared with that of radiography including abdominal plain film (KUB) and intravenous pyelography (IVP).Results: 92.7% of the ureteroliths were detected by ultrasonography,the accuracy of detectability was higher than that of KUB and IVP (62%).Furthermore,ultrasonography provided more direct information of the urinary system and their associated abnormalities which could not be revealed by radiography.Conclusion:Ultrasonography is the method of first choice of imaging investigation for ureterolithiasis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ultrasonography, Radiography, Radiology, Intravenous pyelography, Plain radiography, Abdominal ultrasonography, Conventional radiography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Clinical Value of Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Ureterolithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens