2009Journal of Ultrasound in Clinical MedicineRequires access

Experiences on contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of focal liver lesions

Kangjian Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients with focal liver lesions were examined by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Then their sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were compared. Results The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 69.9%,88.5%,77.0% and 89.2%,92.3%,90.4%,respectively. There was significantly difference between the two methods (P 0.01). Conclusion Conventional ultrasonography can detect focal liver lesions sensitively,while contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can provide more information of this diseases,and it can improve the accuracy in diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients with focal liver lesions were examined by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Then their sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were compared. Results The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 69.9%,88.5%,77.0% and 89.2%,92.3%,90.4%,respectively. There was significantly difference between the two methods (P 0.01). Conclusion Conventional ultrasonography can detect focal liver lesions sensitively,while contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can provide more information of this diseases,and it can improve the accuracy in diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients with focal liver lesions were examined by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Then their sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were compared. Results The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 69.9%,88.5%,77.0% and 89.2%,92.3%,90.4%,respectively. There was significantly difference between the two methods (P 0.01). Conclusion Conventional ultrasonography can detect focal liver lesions sensitively,while contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can provide more information of this diseases,and it can improve the accuracy in diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ultrasound, Ultrasonography, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Contrast (vision), Radiology, Diagnostic accuracy, Differential diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experiences on contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of focal liver lesions — Research Paper | ScholarLens