2009Chinese Journal of Aesthetic MedicineRequires access

Clinical applicative analysis and comparison of two kinds of auricle reconstruction by Medpor framework and cartilage framework

Anmin Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the application and effect of two kinds of auricle reconstruction and find the idea one.Methods 60 cases of congenital microtia or auricle defection after external injury were divided into 2 groups:Group A(34 cases),cartilage framework was wrapped by the extended auricular area skin;Group B(26 cases),Medpor auricular framework was wrapped by the superficial temporal fascia which was covered by skin graft.Results 6 month to 5 years follow-up showed that there are 2 cases with framework exposure,2 cases with unclear figure,1 case with local defection in group A and 1 case with framework exposure,2 cases with unclear figure,1 case with local defection in group B.The cured auricle's satisfactory rate was 85.3% and 84.6 %(P0.05) respectively in two groups.There was no significant difference in two groups.Conclusions Auricle reconstruction with cartilage framework by stages is comparatively reliable,but if the organic characteristics of the Medpor framework are comprehended totally,auricle reconstruction with Medpor framework is an ideal one.By choosing the proper surgical method and skillfully operating during the surgery,auricle reconstruction with Medpor framework method could reduce the complication to the minimal extent,which means less injury,simple operation,short course of treatment and reliable after-operation effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the application and effect of two kinds of auricle reconstruction and find the idea one.Methods 60 cases of congenital microtia or auricle defection after external injury were divided into 2 groups:Group A(34 cases),cartilage framework was wrapped by the extended auricular area skin;Group B(26 cases),Medpor auricular framework was wrapped by the superficial temporal fascia which was covered by skin graft.Results 6 month to 5 years follow-up showed that there are 2 cases with framework exposure,2 cases with unclear figure,1 case with local defection in group A and 1 case with framework exposure,2 cases with unclear figure,1 case with local defection in group B.The cured auricle's satisfactory rate was 85.3% and 84.6 %(P0.05) respectively in two groups.There was no significant difference in two groups.Conclusions Auricle reconstruction with cartilage framework by stages is comparatively reliable,but if the organic characteristics of the Medpor framework are comprehended totally,auricle reconstruction with Medpor framework is an ideal one.By choosing the proper surgical method and skillfully operating during the surgery,auricle reconstruction with Medpor framework method could reduce the complication to the minimal extent,which means less injury,simple operation,short course of treatment and reliable after-operation effect.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the application and effect of two kinds of auricle reconstruction and find the idea one.Methods 60 cases of congenital microtia or auricle defection after external injury were divided into 2 groups:Group A(34 cases),cartilage framework was wrapped by the extended auricular area skin;Group B(26 cases),Medpor auricular framework was wrapped by the superficial temporal fascia which was covered by skin graft.Results 6 month to 5 years follow-up showed that there are 2 cases with framework exposure,2 cases with unclear figure,1 case with local defection in group A and 1 case with framework exposure,2 cases with unclear figure,1 case with local defection in group B.The cured auricle's satisfactory rate was 85.3% and 84.6 %(P0.05) respectively in two groups.There was no significant difference in two groups.Conclusions Auricle reconstruction with cartilage framework by stages is comparatively reliable,but if the organic characteristics of the Medpor framework are comprehended totally,auricle reconstruction with Medpor framework is an ideal one.By choosing the proper surgical method and skillfully operating during the surgery,auricle reconstruction with Medpor framework method could reduce the complication to the minimal extent,which means less injury,simple operation,short course of treatment and reliable after-operation effect.

Key concepts: Auricle, Medicine, Cartilage, Surgery, Microtia, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical applicative analysis and comparison of two kinds of auricle reconstruction by Medpor framework and cartilage framework — Research Paper | ScholarLens