2012Yaowu fenxi zazhiRequires access

Comparison of HPLC and UPLC methods for determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets

Zhang Min-juan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare HPLC and UPLC methods in the determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets.Methods: HPLC condition:Atlantis C18 column(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 1 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃;UPLC condition:Waters Acquity HSS T3 column(2.1 mm×100 mm,1.7 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 0.5 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃.Results: HPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.425-5.30 μg and 0.409-5.110 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 98.6% and 99.0%,respectively.UPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.106-0.743 μg and 0.102-0.715 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 99.1% and 99.2%,respectively.Conclusion: Comparing with HPLC method,UPLC method is relatively quicker,with higher throughput,higher sensitivity and less organic solvent.UPLC method can succeed alternative HPLC for Fructus Evodiae quality control in compound Huangliansu tablets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare HPLC and UPLC methods in the determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets.Methods: HPLC condition:Atlantis C18 column(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 1 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃;UPLC condition:Waters Acquity HSS T3 column(2.1 mm×100 mm,1.7 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 0.5 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃.Results: HPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.425-5.30 μg and 0.409-5.110 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 98.6% and 99.0%,respectively.UPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.106-0.743 μg and 0.102-0.715 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 99.1% and 99.2%,respectively.Conclusion: Comparing with HPLC method,UPLC method is relatively quicker,with higher throughput,higher sensitivity and less organic solvent.UPLC method can succeed alternative HPLC for Fructus Evodiae quality control in compound Huangliansu tablets.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare HPLC and UPLC methods in the determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets.Methods: HPLC condition:Atlantis C18 column(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 1 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃;UPLC condition:Waters Acquity HSS T3 column(2.1 mm×100 mm,1.7 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 0.5 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃.Results: HPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.425-5.30 μg and 0.409-5.110 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 98.6% and 99.0%,respectively.UPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.106-0.743 μg and 0.102-0.715 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 99.1% and 99.2%,respectively.Conclusion: Comparing with HPLC method,UPLC method is relatively quicker,with higher throughput,higher sensitivity and less organic solvent.UPLC method can succeed alternative HPLC for Fructus Evodiae quality control in compound Huangliansu tablets.

Key concepts: High-performance liquid chromatography, Chemistry, Chromatography, Ammonium acetate, Acetonitrile, Elution, Solvent, Gradient elution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of HPLC and UPLC methods for determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets — Research Paper | ScholarLens