Comparison of HPLC and UPLC methods for determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets
Zhang Min-juan
Abstract
Zhang Min-juan
Abstract
Objective: To compare HPLC and UPLC methods in the determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets.Methods: HPLC condition:Atlantis C18 column(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 1 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃;UPLC condition:Waters Acquity HSS T3 column(2.1 mm×100 mm,1.7 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 0.5 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃.Results: HPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.425-5.30 μg and 0.409-5.110 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 98.6% and 99.0%,respectively.UPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.106-0.743 μg and 0.102-0.715 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 99.1% and 99.2%,respectively.Conclusion: Comparing with HPLC method,UPLC method is relatively quicker,with higher throughput,higher sensitivity and less organic solvent.UPLC method can succeed alternative HPLC for Fructus Evodiae quality control in compound Huangliansu tablets.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To compare HPLC and UPLC methods in the determination of evodiamin and rutacarpine in compound Huangliansu tablets.Methods: HPLC condition:Atlantis C18 column(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 1 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃;UPLC condition:Waters Acquity HSS T3 column(2.1 mm×100 mm,1.7 μm),10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate(pH 3.5) as mobile phase A,acetonitrile as mobile phase B,gradient elution,velocity at 0.5 mL·min-1,detected wavelength of 240 nm,column temperature at 35 ℃.Results: HPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.425-5.30 μg and 0.409-5.110 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 98.6% and 99.0%,respectively.UPLC determination:the linear ranges of evodiamin and rutacarpine were 0.106-0.743 μg and 0.102-0.715 μg(r0.999),respectively;the average recovery(n=9) were 99.1% and 99.2%,respectively.Conclusion: Comparing with HPLC method,UPLC method is relatively quicker,with higher throughput,higher sensitivity and less organic solvent.UPLC method can succeed alternative HPLC for Fructus Evodiae quality control in compound Huangliansu tablets.
Key concepts: High-performance liquid chromatography, Chemistry, Chromatography, Ammonium acetate, Acetonitrile, Elution, Solvent, Gradient elution