Comparison between GP and MVP regimen for adanced Non-small cell lung cancer
Wang Xiao-xin
Abstract
Wang Xiao-xin
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity between GP (Gemcitabine + Cisplatin) regimen and MVP (Mitomycin+Vindesine + Cisplatin) regimen in the treatment of advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. [Methods] Seventy-five cases of NSCLC were enrolled .Among them,42 cases were treated with GP regimen. (GEM 1.0 g/m 2 ivgtt d1,8, DDP 25 mg/m 2 ivgtt d 1-3). Of 33 cases were treated with MVP regimen (MMC 8 mg/m 2 iv di,VDS 3 mg/m 2 ivgtt di,8 DDP 25 mg/m 2 ivgtt d 1-3).The patients in two groups were repeatedly treated every 3 weeks and evaluated the efficacy after 2 cycles. [Results] For the cases with GP regimen ,the overall response rate was 57.1% with complete response 4 cases and partial response 20 cases. For the cases with MVP regimen the overall response rate was 36.4% with complete response 1 case and with partial response 11 cases . There was significant difference between two groups (P0.05) . Major toxicity is myelosuppression. The thrombocytopenia for GP regimen is higher than MVP regimen (40.5% versus 27.3%). The leucocytopenia for MVP regimen is higher than GP regimen (72.7% versus 50.0 %) (P0.05). [Conclusion] GP than MVP regimen for advanced NSCLC shows a good curative effect and low toxicity. It deserves further clinical application.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity between GP (Gemcitabine + Cisplatin) regimen and MVP (Mitomycin+Vindesine + Cisplatin) regimen in the treatment of advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. [Methods] Seventy-five cases of NSCLC were enrolled .Among them,42 cases were treated with GP regimen. (GEM 1.0 g/m 2 ivgtt d1,8, DDP 25 mg/m 2 ivgtt d 1-3). Of 33 cases were treated with MVP regimen (MMC 8 mg/m 2 iv di,VDS 3 mg/m 2 ivgtt di,8 DDP 25 mg/m 2 ivgtt d 1-3).The patients in two groups were repeatedly treated every 3 weeks and evaluated the efficacy after 2 cycles. [Results] For the cases with GP regimen ,the overall response rate was 57.1% with complete response 4 cases and partial response 20 cases. For the cases with MVP regimen the overall response rate was 36.4% with complete response 1 case and with partial response 11 cases . There was significant difference between two groups (P0.05) . Major toxicity is myelosuppression. The thrombocytopenia for GP regimen is higher than MVP regimen (40.5% versus 27.3%). The leucocytopenia for MVP regimen is higher than GP regimen (72.7% versus 50.0 %) (P0.05). [Conclusion] GP than MVP regimen for advanced NSCLC shows a good curative effect and low toxicity. It deserves further clinical application.
Key concepts: Regimen, Vindesine, Medicine, Gemcitabine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Cisplatin, Lung cancer