Clinical observation of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones
Wang Gong-xu
Abstract
Wang Gong-xu
Abstract
Objective:To study clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones.Methods:90 ureteral stone patients were divided into study group and control group according to the different lithotripsy schemes.The study group received ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy(LL),while the control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL).The operation time and the stone clearance rate 3 months after the treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:For the stones 1.0 cm and ≤1.0 cm,the operation time of study group was shorter than that of control group(P 0.05).For the stones 1.0 cm,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were91.67% and 68.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).For the stones in middle and lower ureter,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were 92.59% and 72.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusions:For the stones in the upper ureter and with a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm,ESWL is superior to LL;however,for the stones in middle and lower ureter and with a diameter of 1.0 cm,LL is more suitable.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To study clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones.Methods:90 ureteral stone patients were divided into study group and control group according to the different lithotripsy schemes.The study group received ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy(LL),while the control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL).The operation time and the stone clearance rate 3 months after the treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:For the stones 1.0 cm and ≤1.0 cm,the operation time of study group was shorter than that of control group(P 0.05).For the stones 1.0 cm,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were91.67% and 68.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).For the stones in middle and lower ureter,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were 92.59% and 72.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusions:For the stones in the upper ureter and with a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm,ESWL is superior to LL;however,for the stones in middle and lower ureter and with a diameter of 1.0 cm,LL is more suitable.
Key concepts: Medicine, Lithotripsy, Ureter, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Laser lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Urology, Surgery