2015•Medical Journal of Chinese People's HealthRequires access

Clinical observation of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones

Wang Gong-xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To study clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones.Methods:90 ureteral stone patients were divided into study group and control group according to the different lithotripsy schemes.The study group received ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy(LL),while the control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL).The operation time and the stone clearance rate 3 months after the treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:For the stones 1.0 cm and ≤1.0 cm,the operation time of study group was shorter than that of control group(P 0.05).For the stones 1.0 cm,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were91.67% and 68.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).For the stones in middle and lower ureter,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were 92.59% and 72.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusions:For the stones in the upper ureter and with a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm,ESWL is superior to LL;however,for the stones in middle and lower ureter and with a diameter of 1.0 cm,LL is more suitable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To study clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones.Methods:90 ureteral stone patients were divided into study group and control group according to the different lithotripsy schemes.The study group received ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy(LL),while the control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL).The operation time and the stone clearance rate 3 months after the treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:For the stones 1.0 cm and ≤1.0 cm,the operation time of study group was shorter than that of control group(P 0.05).For the stones 1.0 cm,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were91.67% and 68.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).For the stones in middle and lower ureter,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were 92.59% and 72.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusions:For the stones in the upper ureter and with a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm,ESWL is superior to LL;however,for the stones in middle and lower ureter and with a diameter of 1.0 cm,LL is more suitable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To study clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones.Methods:90 ureteral stone patients were divided into study group and control group according to the different lithotripsy schemes.The study group received ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy(LL),while the control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL).The operation time and the stone clearance rate 3 months after the treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:For the stones 1.0 cm and ≤1.0 cm,the operation time of study group was shorter than that of control group(P 0.05).For the stones 1.0 cm,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were91.67% and 68.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).For the stones in middle and lower ureter,the stone clearance rates 3 months after the treatment of study group and control group were 92.59% and 72.00%,respectively,and the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusions:For the stones in the upper ureter and with a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm,ESWL is superior to LL;however,for the stones in middle and lower ureter and with a diameter of 1.0 cm,LL is more suitable.

Key concepts: Medicine, Lithotripsy, Ureter, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Laser lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Urology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation of ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for patients with ureteral stones — Research Paper | ScholarLens