Study on the Clinical Effects of Different Repair Methods on 159 Cases with Maxillary Anterior Teeth Loss

Objective To explore the different repair methods for patients with maxillary anterior teeth loss and the clinical effects of them. Methods 159 cases with maxillary anterior teeth loss admitted in our hospital were randomly divided into group A, group B, and group C. Group A used bone augmentation technique for dental implantation, group B used flexible denture and group C used porcelain crown and bridge technology for restoration. 6 months after the operation, the patients were re-examined, and the healing status of the patients was observed and recorded. Results 6 months after the repair of maxillary anterior teeth loss, the healing rate of implant and the surrounding bone tissue of group A was 92.5%(49/53), much higher than that of group B(58.5%,31/53) and group C(60.4%, 32/53), there were statistically significant differences in the excellent and good healing rate between the groups(χ2=5.482, 5.609; P0.05). Conclusion For patients with maxillary anterior teeth loss, bone augmentation technique has good repair effects, it can cover the space between the repaired bone tissue and the implant better, and greatly improve the success rate of repairing, so it is worth the clinical promotion.